The Gisele Bundchen Show Brings Today's Links!
Posted on Monday, March 20th, 2006 @ 12:37pm by Moelicious

This looks like one of those things you see inside the Red Light District in Amsterdam where you can see women doing weird things through a clear window. I know there are a lot of symbols and crap @ work here, so have fun finding them---or not.
Enjoy all the links below! Only the best, baby.
* The Jolie-Pitt Fetus Radar
* Can you believe Brad Pitt went from Juliete Lewis to J. Aniston to Angelina Jolie. Dude...
* Tom Sizemore has been around. Dude got a piece of Liz HURLEY when Hugh Grant was banging dirty prosties!
* American Next Top Model sucking you? By the way, is there anyone super hot this time around?
* Kristie Alley's the new Anna Nicole! Let's hope she keeps her entire body covered.
* Paris dumps Stavie w/ lifelong memory of their relationship (i.e. herpes)
* For the billionth time: Is Britney FAT or PREGNANT? You know you want to know...
* Kevin Federline is sporting a new do
| 27 Bastardly Comments »

doesnt look like gisele...but oh well. shes hot.
yea theres something pretty about her.. it looks different than her but w/e shes still a pretty girl.. not usual beauty.. but still pretty
Ribs... protruding...
Ewww- gross. And what do these ugly poses have to do with fashion? They belong in mags like Hustler or worse. She is such a two-faced bitch -acting all innocent and all on talk shows and above it all about not baring her ass - I don't mind nudity at all - these are just plain ugly and gross and the ones with kids is offensive as hell.
The only thing that would make those pictures better is if she was totaly naked and there was a live wolverine in the box with her
How many high fashion ads have you guys actually seen? There is much more provocative stuff out there than this. She's just doing her job.
I really like John's idea.
Wait. I just noticed those people "looking in" are actually pretty much Photoshopped in there, and it looks fake as hell, at least to me.
Ugh, clashing.
I don't know, I mean, she's interesting looking, but is she really someone at whom you'd want to stare in her underpants? She's like a plank and, even with the boob job, has small boobs. I think she's pretty in an unusual way, but not sexy at all. I'm a girl and not attracted to girls, so maybe I just don't get it, but...come on. She is a board.
Its a skeleton with a skin wrap
i do think she has a gorgeous body, but most of the magazines i read ARE fashion and high fashion magazines...and i don't see ads where the models have their legs spread open wide displaying their labias to little boy;some are provocative yes i know, but i think picturing children looking at those images is too much...but whatever, it's 2006 .
yasmin,
I think if you really want to analyze it, my guess is that having the young children be witnessing the most "obscene" shot is probably more satirical than overtly dirty. I mean, the whole concept of having the woman in a glass box on display in skimpy attire while various people walk by and gawk is, I think, a statement in and of itself. Then when you consider that the most sexual pose is reserved for the youngest witnesses, I think it's a reference to sex being sold and flaunted to younger and younger audiences these days.
I just don't think the ad is meant to be taken as Gisele trying to be sexy. It seems like it's criticizing her objectification. But then again, even if I'm reading into it too much and it is just supposed to be her nearly naked and nothing more, like I said before, I've seen much worse.
What happened to AMerica? Why have we become such a pornographic shithole? (In light of recent attempts to CENSOR ME, I won't comment on how Jews run the porn/entertainment industries)
Gil OUT!
Has it occured to you that this is a wax figure?
oh how elegant and classy, spreading her legs soooo wide while children look at her crotch...!!!! Her family would be so proud...***rolling eyes***
you say its her job?? heck she can refuse to do certain poses..really!! where is her morals??? or dignity...I guess it stayed inside the glass box!! I don't get why people think she has a great body..she has no WAIST....a long bean pole!!! nicer to see a woman curvier and petite...I mean she towers over most men..she is 5ft 11...not feminine at all!! I just don't get her appeal at all!!
well i love the way gisele looks and i wish i looked just like her...i have pictures of her all over my home for inspiration...she's absolutely gorgeous...and did it ever occur to you that all the people in the backgrounds were just edited in??? come on...give her a break
c'mon its not fair to call her a slut shes a model she has to play a part that is her job and i think those people were put in besides no model would be sucessful if they didnt do things they didnt wanna do
Well its to bad that everyone has such negative things to say about these photos. The only thing I see wrong with them is, I'm not there myself. I think Giselle is hot as hell and to the women that disagree, It's only from jealousy because you are ugly as shyt and she is a Victoria Secret supermodel, and to the men it's because you take it where the sun dont shine. And i think thats about it until some dummy has something stupid to say.
TO JEFF
You are such a typical guy. Anyone who dislikes Gisele is jealous and ugly? Ha! You men will say anything. What the hell do you know about girls and jealousy? That's right you don't know shit! You are a dumb guy, not a girl! So shut up. And as for you being in that box with her, you wish, punk! I don't think the fashion world brings on insecurities and eating disorders in young women. Men do!
Theorem #1. I'm pissed off.
proof; gisele is scorching hot and gisele is
scorching hot flaming nuclear fusion hot enough to roast the eyes out of your skull hot enough to burn the shit out of your brain=>
anyone who disagrees is a #@$%^@#$&^@#$%%@##^!!!!!; i.e., words cannot contain my dislike for such jackasses and moronic fucking retards who cannot reason logically in their own minds to conclude that she defines the standard for what it means to be physically beautiful. quod erat demonstrandum, jackasses.
the last time i looked at a high fashion mag, i had to go eat a big mac. these girls are all basically skanks, and this is with photoshop, cytex machines ( i thinks that's what they call them) and all kinds of makeup and lighting. please give me a woman who hasn't puked up her last 300 meals anytime.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz boring pictures
She has a manly face, not pretty at all. The first photo is gross - with the kids and all.
Moose is right, here. If you ever pick up a fashion magazine and compare this to the photoshoots in there, you'll think this is innocent. It's supposed to be arty and original, in the photographers view. It's not Giselle that chose to do this, she just did what they told her to do. She is just doing her job. In some fashion ads you can't even see the clothes. I still think she has an absoluetly gorgeous body, no matter what.
and moronic fucking retards who cannot reason logically in their own minds to conclude that she defines the standard for what it means to be physically beautiful
Real classy - not! What a slut.
OMG, she'll do anything for the money. What degrading poses. Maybe in that first pic she's auditioning for basic instinct III - nice spread job Giselle!
Make a Scandalous Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!