Jennifer Metcalfe Bikini Pics From Marbella, Spain!

Jennifer Metcalfe (born in Bradford, West Yorkshire, England.) is an English actress and model She joined the cast of soap opera Hollyoaks in early 2006, playing feisty Mercedes McQueen.

In August 2008, whilst Jennifer was partying with friends at a Marbella nightclub, she was forced to flee along with hundreds of other clubbers as a gunfight broke out and two British men were shot. Wiki

Comment on this Bastardly entry »

73 Scandalous Comments

the last pic, it looks like she is saying, "Where'd my boobs go?"

I though there was a UN resolution that said all female British celebrities had to have HUGE boobs.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:27am
Reply to this Comment

Its not all about boobs you know. She has an amazing body overall... her legs are incredible!

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 12:13am
Reply to this Comment

That is a big sweet ass perched on some big sweet hips attached to that tiny little torso. I think I'm totally loving it.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:22am
Reply to this Comment

shes wide hipped

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:57am
Reply to this Comment

She reminds me of Megan Fox. Her character on Hollyoaks is trashy looking just like Megan too.
Blah face and ok body. She's pear shaped.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:41am
Reply to this Comment

I hate those kind of bikinis. They're ugly and why are her armpits white?

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 7:01am
Reply to this Comment

she is probably wearing antiperspirant on her armpits. you're ugly.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 8:42am
Reply to this Comment

She is disproportionate.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 7:43am
Reply to this Comment

Needs more size in her upper half or less size in her lower half. I'd recommend a boob job before an ass reduction.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 8:09am
Reply to this Comment

sweeet! and a beer guzzler too. I likey this girl.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:19am
Reply to this Comment

her figure is unique ,but something looks strange.. i cant decide how i feel about it .. one thing i know: her waist/hip ratio is incredible

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:32am
Reply to this Comment

Her body is amazing, it's her face that's kind of weird... makes her look like an annoying pixie.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:40am
Reply to this Comment

Those are some major birthing hips.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:23am
Reply to this Comment

im waiting for j alba beach pics

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:27am
Reply to this Comment

She has a nice body. And her hips aren't big, she just has a really tiny waist. Which is a good thing, unless you're attracted to boys or little girls with no hips at all. (I know people use the "you're gay or a pedophile" thing all the time and lots of people get offfended, but its true. There is nothing more feminine than hips and ass. That is something a man will never have, so a real man SHOULD appreciate a nice pair of curvy hips and ass unless he doesn't like real women).

She is very feminine and has a cute little toned body... No complaints here.
And her perky small tits are going to age better than a pair of big ones.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:47am
Reply to this Comment

I know you and I don't always see eye-to-eye, but I am so with you on this one.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:25pm
Reply to this Comment

Her hips ARE big, it isn't just an illusion created by a small waist. Yes, her waist is small but there's no doubt her hips are also big. Not that that's a bad thing as long as they're not big because of excessive body fat, which in her case they're not.
Oh, and if appreciating or prefering other body types means one is gay then there's a lot of gay men out there.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:40pm
Reply to this Comment

It's all about hip-to-waist ratio. Having narrow hips can be fine and beautiful as well as long as you don't have a wide waist.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:46pm
Reply to this Comment

actually it's all about hip-to-waist-to-bust ratio :)

Hour-glass > pear

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:09pm
Reply to this Comment

I agree with you both, but you, pstroyer, most women are not hourglasses.

"Hourglass shape
the waist circumference is less than 75% of the chest or hips circumferences, which are virtually the same. Body fat distribution tends to be around both the upper body and lower body. This body type enlarges the arms, breasts, hips and rear before other parts, including waist and upper abdomen. Due to the preference shown to physical symmetry, many celebrities falsely claim hourglass measurements but actually rate closer to a straight figure or apple.

A study of over 6,000 women carried out by researchers at the North Carolina State University around 2005 found that 46% were Banana (rectangular), just over 20% Pear, just under 14% Apple, and 8% Hourglass.

New research suggests that hourglass women may live longest, and apple-shaped the shortest."

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:16pm
Reply to this Comment

I know :) Was talking ideals...

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:33pm
Reply to this Comment

Which is why men find hourglasses to be the most attractive and why women who aren't hourglasses get all upset and defensive.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:07pm
Reply to this Comment

Wow, that was really interesting. I knew that about apple-shaped women though. It can't be healthy to have most of your fat distributed around your waist.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 8:12am
Reply to this Comment

No it isn't, which is why doctors nowadays use not only the BMI but also the waist-to-hip ratio to assess a patients health (weight-wise). It's recommended that men have waists no bigger than 40'' and WHR no bigger than 0.9, and that women have waists no bigger than 35'' and WHR no bigger than 0.85.

If you found what I posted above to be interesting you might like to read this as well:

"Scientists have discovered that the waist-hip ratio (WHR) is a significant factor in judging female attractiveness. Women with a 0.7 WHR (waist circumference that is 70% of the hip circumference) are usually rated as more attractive by men from European cultures. Such diverse beauty icons as Audrey Hepburn, Marilyn Monroe, Sophia Loren, Gong Li, and even the Venus de Milo all have ratios around 0.7, even though they have different weights. In other cultures, preferences appear to vary according to some studies, ranging from 0.6 in China to 0.8 or 0.9 in parts of South America and Africa, and divergent preferences based on ethnicity, rather than nationality, have also been noted.

Note: In the studies referenced above, only frontal WHR preferences differed significantly among racial and cultural groups. When actual (circumferential) measurements were made, the preferred WHR tended toward the expected value of 0.7 universally. The apparent differences are most likely due to the different body fat storage patterns in different population groups. For example, women of African descent tend to store their fat in their buttocks more than women of other groups. Therefore, their WHR as viewed from the front may appear to be much greater than when viewed from the side. The inverse may be true of women of East Asian ancestry. Therefore, African men appear to value a woman's small WHR in profile and an Asian men may place more value on an exaggerated frontal WHR compared to European men.

While the study is still being reviewed, there is a moderate correlation between WHR and intelligence of offspring. Using data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics, William Lassek at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania and Steven Gaulin of the University of California, Santa Barbara, found a child's performance in cognition tests was linked to their mother's waist-hip ratio, a proxy for how much fat she stores on her hips.

Children whose mothers had wide hips and a low waist-hip ratio scored highest, leading Lassek and Gaulin to suggest that fetuses benefit from hip fat that contains polyunsaturated fatty acids critical for the development of the fetus's brain."

"The Body Mass Index (BMI) is another important universal determinant to the perception of beauty. The BMI refers to the proportion of the body mass to the body structure. However, the optimal body proportion is interpreted differently in various cultures. The Western ideal considers a slim and slender body mass as optimal while many historic cultures consider an embonpoint or plump body-mass as appealing. Men don't seem to have evolved to hold a particular build as more attractive, but rather to be drawn to whichever build associates with social status."

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 4:13pm
Reply to this Comment

So if my WHR is 0.6 (which is is), that means I'm the Asian ideal? For some reason, I doubt it.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 11:37pm
Reply to this Comment

I'm wrong, it's actual 0.65. Hmmm... I'll be pondering this one for awhile... damn you Atom! lol. Now I'll be eyeing women on the street trying to guess their waist-to-hip ratio.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 11:40pm
Reply to this Comment

Wait, was that article just implying that Asian chicks have no ass? lol

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 11:45pm
Reply to this Comment

Well, from my own point of view no they don't. Have you ever been to an Asian country? Many Asian woman have very flat butts (except for Thai women). I don't mean to say that I don't like them because I do, I love Asian women, but they're not exactly well endowed when it comes to ass and breasts.

This is my personal opinion, I don't think that's what the article was implying. The article was simply explaining that a woman can have a low WHR due to wide hips, a full butt or a little of both and that in certain places of Africa and South America men prefer women with full butts rather than wide hips, while in China men prefer women with wide hips.

Thursday, September 25th, 2008 @ 1:25pm
Reply to this Comment

Maria, men can have big hips and asses, too, your logic doesn't hold up. Google for "Endomorph."

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:21pm
Reply to this Comment

Are you mentally disabled? I would really like to know before I go ahead and mock you.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 8:13am
Reply to this Comment

nothing a breast lift couldnt handle

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:57am
Reply to this Comment

I don't get the wide hips comments coming from men. I love hips on a woman. It separates them from us. Never will understand the Hollywood fascination with boyish figures.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 11:46am
Reply to this Comment

them some breeder hips, she gonna slide out the little ones...

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 11:59am
Reply to this Comment

Lot of ass on such a skinny body....suprisingly hot

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 12:48pm
Reply to this Comment

hotness. real nice girl too

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 1:51pm
Reply to this Comment

'Hey, more beer over here'

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 2:00pm
Reply to this Comment

beautiful sexy body..love that curvy waist and nice ass. i feel as though shes the girl that all the other girls hate cause shes skinny yet has a big ass with no cellulite

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 2:56pm
Reply to this Comment

You see, to me, this is a great, sexy body. Small natural boobs, and a nice big ass centering a nice sturdy trunk, with healthy, adult thighs. And I think her face is nice too. This is what I want to be playing with in bed. She has a body built for fucking. Hard fucking. With a pelvic region like that, you can really go to town and open shit up.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:39pm
Reply to this Comment

What the??.. Now that's a body!! Very nice... very, very, very nice. Mnph!!

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:43pm
Reply to this Comment

them's be child bearing hips....and by extension, as Sid so aptly pointed out, a body built for fucking.

eez a spicy meatball.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:45pm
Reply to this Comment

who wouldn't hit that?

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:47pm
Reply to this Comment

I just did a google search on Ms Metcalfe, with the safe search off, and after having looked at the evidence, I have to say (and I know this is heresy) that I think she is hotter than Megan Fox. Sorry. And I also think that Ms Metcalfe is going to be my Internet crush/fantasy/object of desire for the foreseeable future, which in Internet terms, means about two weeks or so. Either way, if I could create my own dream girl, I'm pretty sure that I would want her to look like Ms Metcalfe. Perfection in every way. Face and body are top shelf. And again, not to be redundant, but if you can't see what is so delectable about that body, the shape of her hips, then you need to go on medication. That is the female form at it's peak.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 3:54pm
Reply to this Comment

Yes, she has incredible hips, but she has no tits to balance out her body. She looks disproportional and looks bottom heavy. Women with wide hips need something up top to give their bodies some balance and she has nothing. I'm not even a breast man, but in her case, she needs them. She also looks like Lindsay Lohan's little sister, Alison. I'm not really sure that's a positive thing.

Hotter than Megan Fox, huh?

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:11pm
Reply to this Comment

Exactly. And it's not just her bust. It's her ribcage as well..

Really nice hip / waist ratio. Unfortunately she's disproportionate.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:28pm
Reply to this Comment

Megan Fox has a nasty body. She has (had) small floppy dog tits, but got breast implants. Also, she has the weirdest hips. Megan's hips start too low, they don't start right under her waist, her hips start lower and carry on to her thighs making her thighs curve outwards and making her look bowthighed (like bowlegged). Its hard to explain, but she has a bad body and it is not in proportion.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:05pm
Reply to this Comment

A nasty body? haha, who are you kidding. Yea, I'm sure everyone who watched Transformers were like "Good god! That woman has a NASTY body!"

Megan Fox's body is not bad and she obviously has a much better face than this chick.

Great face + good body > Great body + good face.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:17pm
Reply to this Comment

She does have a bad body. I'm shocked that you, Mr. Picky perfectionist, doesn't agree.

I never said Jennifer Metcalfe has a good face, don't assume things. I think this bitch is average and borderline ugly, but she has a much better body.

And most people watching transformers were desperate, horny men who don't pay attention to anything other than tits and ass in skanky clothes and a blowup doll face with DSL's attached to it. The only reason Megan is so popular among men is because she looks like an easy whore and she can't stop talking about sex.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:33pm
Reply to this Comment

In other words, Megan's Fuckin' HOT!!

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:44pm
Reply to this Comment

"I never said Jennifer Metcalfe has a good face, don't assume things."

I never said you said that either, don't assume things.

Like I said, Megan Fox does not have a bad body and referring to it as 'nasty' just makes you look like a jealous skank, but maybe that's what you were going for. This chick doesn't have a bad body either, but her lower half is disproportionate to her upper half and for some reason you failed to mention this in your initial post. And here you are talking about the disproportionality of Megan's body instead of just admitting that this chick does in fact have a disproportionate body. I just find it funny that you're celebrating a girl like this and then hating on women who are considered far more desirable by the average male. Intimidated much?

Look, I'm not even a huge Megan Fox fan but I'd take Megan over this broad any day.

This is a nasty body btw.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLSnZjLPor8

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 7:39pm
Reply to this Comment

I'm not jealous of Megan.

Small saggy tits, weird low hips, stubby legs, sausage arms, flat ass= bad body

Megan's face is 1000 times better than this "fetus face" (I'm quoting Anonymous black chick) but I never mentioned her face to begin with, you brought it up.

I was responding to ACE's comment. He said this chick is out of proportion when Megan Fox is out of proportion and has a worse body. He is just distracted by her pretty yet whorish face and her attitude. We haven't even seen Megan Fox bikini candids...

Stop being so argumentative, Pstroyer. I see you've had fights with lots of people on this site. You take everything too seriously. People can disagree, yet you take it to a whole new level.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 8:50pm
Reply to this Comment

lol, I'm not taking it seriously at all. I like to argue, that's true, but it doesn't have to be about important or serious matters. I mean, on this site it's usually about completely pointless and subjective stuff but I like expressing my opinion regardless. I guess I'm just argumentative and opinionated by nature. It's not something I can just "stop". And I don't remember my having any fights here, only exchanges of opinion :)

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 9:26pm
Reply to this Comment

I know exactly what you mean. I too have been accused of being argumentative, but from my perspective I'm just expressing my opinions. It's not a matter of picking a fight with anyone, I just like a good conversation where people express their own points of view. Nothing wrong with that.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 10:05pm
Reply to this Comment

Megan may not be the most naturally beautiful woman in the world or have the nicest body either, but with Megan, it's all about her sex appeal. The woman is just sexy as hell like no other. At the end of the day, it's all about sex appeal with me.

Sex appeal trumps everything.

Pstroyer, look at you sticking up for Megan...this is great!

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 8:52am
Reply to this Comment

I personally would take this woman's body over Douzen Kroes' (I'm comparing them since they're both breastless and both had bikini candids on the site within the last few days). The hourglass is indeed, rare. Douzten has broader shoulders and narrower hips, so she's more disproportionate in that sense. If the choice came between top-heavy (not in the sense of your cups runneth over, but in the sense of being more apple-shaped) and bottom-heavy (more pear-shaped), I'm going with the latter everytime. It's just healthier. And you're more fertile that way too.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 8:20am
Reply to this Comment

IF Doutzen Kroes's measurements are indeed 35-24-35, her waist is 68.57% of her bust and hips, which are the exact same size. This means Doutzen Kroes is an hourglass. She might not look like what we expect an hourglass to look like, but according to her measurements she is one.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 4:20pm
Reply to this Comment

When I think of an hourglass I think of Cora Skinner or Kelly Brook. Not Doutzen Kroes with her big shoulders. Sorry, just being honest.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 11:29pm
Reply to this Comment

When I think of an hourglass I think of Cora Skinner or Kelly Brook. Not Doutzen Kroes with her big shoulders. Sorry, just being honest.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 11:29pm
Reply to this Comment

I know exactly what you mean, you don't have to be sorry. It's just that there can be different types of hourglasses, just as there are women of different sizes with the same WHR (Alessandra Ambrosio, Marilyn Monroe, pre-pregnancy Jessica Alba). Let's also consider the following, a woman can have a low WHR due to a full butt instead of wide hips which means her hip measurement is "big" also because of her full butt. So, in this situation a woman can have the measurements of an hourglass and not have the expected appearance.

Thursday, September 25th, 2008 @ 1:48pm
Reply to this Comment

*don't agree

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:34pm
Reply to this Comment

its not really her boobs that will balance out her body, its her shoulders. if her shoulders were a little bit wider, she'd be balanced out. but aside from that, she has a really nice body.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:31pm
Reply to this Comment

Good point. Her whole upper body doesn't match her lower body. I think a nice pair of boobs would help her.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:43pm
Reply to this Comment

she needs shoulders AND boobs in my opinion...dysmorphic body right now.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:43pm
Reply to this Comment

She would really need to develop her shoulders to balance out her body and then she would be too muscular like Jessica Biel. She should go with the implants and then we'll take another look.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 4:51pm
Reply to this Comment

Some of you are too picky. I would love to have a body like that.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:13pm
Reply to this Comment

Wiki:
Jennifer metcalfe is a drunken whore (very common in the uk) spending her 15 seconds of fame on the beach thanks to a random appearance in a shitty soap opera before ballooning to the size of a vending machine like all the other british girls do.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:31pm
Reply to this Comment

I agree that her body is disproportional but aside from that she's definitely a good example of a truly curvy woman. Her curves are all about bone structure and not about fat like most of the so-called curvy celebrities out there.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:37pm
Reply to this Comment

She is a little fetus-faced though. Only bad thing.

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 5:49pm
Reply to this Comment

LOL @ "fetus-faced".

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 @ 6:32pm
Reply to this Comment

I would not want to be her husband when she has a baby...just WAIT!! She will be a severe, fat pear!!!

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 10:45am
Reply to this Comment

Mmmm... not necessarily. Victoria Beckham and my mother both ended up skinnier after kids. Kids don't have to destroy your body.

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 2:59pm
Reply to this Comment

ew drinking beer looking like a slag its never hard to notice the british people on holiday

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 @ 12:32pm
Reply to this Comment

Victoria Beckham is not a nasty disproportionate PEAR..that was my point.

Brooke Burke and Jessica Alba are genetic perfection with their body type (athletic) and their post children bodies.

Thursday, September 25th, 2008 @ 9:21am
Reply to this Comment

she's got a gorgeous body to die for!

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 @ 6:07am
Reply to this Comment

Make a Scandalous Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.

Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!