Marisa Miller Lookin' Super Hot Walking Around Times Square!
Thursday, June 26th, 2008 in the middle of the damn afternoon
These were snapped a couple days back in NYC.Marissa Miller turns 30 on August 6th, so she's doing just fine in the "aging well" department. Just look at those damn legs!! Holy God.
And, as most of you know, 2008 is kicking ass for Marissa...
The swell in publicity resulting from her 2008 work served to land Marisa in the number one spot on Maxim magazine's "Hot 100" rankings for 2008,[19] beating out list regulars such as Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Biel, and Eva Longoria-Parker. This marked the first time anyone has debuted on the list in the number one position.[20] In her subsequent cover story for the July issue, Maxim proclaimed her as the "return of the great American supermodel." She also finished first place in The Best Damn Sports Show Period "Smokin' Sixteen" competition in 2008,[21] repeating her 2007 win over competitors such as supermodels Gisele Bundchen and Adriana Lima. Also in 2008, Marisa ranked #9 in the Askmen.com's "Top 99", an increase of three places from the previous year, which was a two-place increase itself from 2006. [Wiki]
Related in a Bastardly way:
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Gisele Bundchen Makes Money Walking Down Street!
- Marisa Miller in Body Paint Does 2007 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue
- Marisa Miller Does 2007 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Adriana Gets Sized For Her Ring!!
- Marisa Miller @ Spike TV's 2nd Annual "Guys Choice" Awards












Kind of looks like Jessica Simpson here.
Reply to this Comment
omg those legs.........
Reply to this Comment
How important is hair and make-up, ladies? Never mind. I know the answer is: VERY IMPORTANT. Look at Marisa all dolled up. Repeat after me: There's nothing more important in the world than to be a beautiful girl. It's hard work to make a sunburned over the hill supermodel look good, but it's worth it.
Reply to this Comment
I don't think she's aging that well, her skin is awful. She does have great legs though.
Reply to this Comment
Her skin looks flawless to me...
Reply to this Comment
She looks 40. She has a wandering eye or at least her eyes look in two different directions. Her skin reminds me more of a saddle than a woman. Totally overrated.
Reply to this Comment
Agree with Leni.. omg those legs........
And I want those fu@#$%* shoes!!!
Reply to this Comment
I prefer her nearly naked, but still HOT as hell! Too much typing now I really need a drink!
Reply to this Comment
lmao dude, thats fine man
Reply to this Comment
I agree with Richard and Leni, but I disagree with that comments that she has awful skin, is not aging well, and has a wandering eye.
Reply to this Comment
Look at her eyes. One is looking at me, the other is looking at my twin three feet to my right. There isn't one picture of her above where both of her eyes are focused on the same thing. It's not blatantly obvious, but she's slightly wall-eyed.
And come on, she's 29. You shouldn't look like that at 29 unless you've spent YEARS in the sun (which is probably why she looks old for her age).
As to Ed Yang's comment below, sure, I agree. If she was working at Wal-Mart when I went in to pick up my family size bag of Tater Tots and Mayonnaise, I'd be pleasantly surprised to find somebody like her checking me out. But in the context of "omg supermodels!!11!", she's not all that impressive. That's not to say I wouldn't follow her around just for the chance to smell her farts if she asked me to, but looking at the bigger picture is important here.
Reply to this Comment
is pstroyer a he? i thought it was a she... anyway you wont convince me by saying that pstroyer would agree with you... i need a stronger argument.... by the way 'if 10.000 say a foolish thing, is still a foolish thing'
anyway, in those pics the camera targeting on her face...
if you think she has short legs, thats fine, i dont agree, but i am not going to argue for ever like some others do... besides its marissa's legs not mine
Reply to this Comment
wrong place for my comment...
Reply to this Comment
" I'd be pleasantly surprised to find somebody like her checking me out. But in the context of "omg supermodels!!11!", she's not all that impressive."
totally correct, but i think that in category "omg supermodels!!11!" there are lot of girls that are overrated..
when it comes to marisa: her face isnt as good as her body
but i must admit , that her body is very close to perfection (i prefer smaller and tighter breasts + she could be little shorter like 5`6, but as we all know: model lie about their heights, so i guess that she actually could be 5`6-5`7 )
Reply to this Comment
She has short legs and a long torso.
Reply to this Comment
she does have great gams
Reply to this Comment
goddess
Reply to this Comment
everybody bashes alessandra ambrosio for having short legs and a long torso but alessandra looks fine.. Marisa is a lot worse.
looook:
http://content.mahalo.com/images/7/71/Marisa_miller_RM_021408.jpg
Reply to this Comment
are u kiding? her body looks perfect! is just the position of the camera, above her torso and gives the impression that the legs are short. (if you dont believe - try it home)
Reply to this Comment
Well if it is "just the angle" then why are there so many photos from different angles where it STILL looks like she has short legs and a long torso?
Just look at her legs in these photos. They don't look long. And they would look even shorter if she weren't wearing heels. Big heels create the illusion of having long legs.
And her torso is undeniable long. I bet ya anything that Pstroyer would agree with me and he is a perfectionist and knows all about proportions.
Reply to this Comment
is pstroyer a he? i thought it was a she... anyway you wont convince me by saying that pstroyer would agree with you... i need a stronger argument.... by the way 'if 10.000 say a foolish thing, is still a foolish thing'
anyway, in those pics the camera targeting on her face...
if you think she has short legs, thats fine, i dont agree, but i am not going to argue for ever like some others do... besides its marissa's legs not mine
Reply to this Comment
She is pretty perfect.
Reply to this Comment
In any other context, Marissa Miller would be the hottest woman any man has ever seen, but since she's a "model," it's easy to overlook her appeal. Just as a thought exercise, imagine that Marissa is not a model, that she is something else, and that you come upon her (pun intended) in these hypothetical scenarios. We will start with the most logial one first:
1) Marissa Miller is one of the teachers at your high school.
2) Marissa Miller is the rececptionist at your dentist's office.
3) Marissa Miller is a hostess at your favorite restaurant.
4) Marissa Miller is your best friend's girlfriend.
5) Marissa Miller is your veterinarian.
I'm not trying to argue that she is the hottest woman on the planet. That's a ridiculous argument to make. But to act befuddled at her appeal is equally ridiculous.
Reply to this Comment
Wow, you're totally right. I thought her body was hot but her face was fucking ugly. But then I pictured her to be either my dentist or my dentist's assistant and she's soo much hotter than that balding 45-year old guy or that overweight, probably even older, saggy, bored-looking hag.
Reply to this Comment
if shes 29, then shes not aging well because she looks much older. But if, as i expect, shes nearer forty then she looks really really good. Im not being bitchy, a lot of models lie about their age. I do think shes really sexy and has a gorgeous face but its just her skin. I just see sun damage when i look at her. Maybe she just needs to moisturise more or just fake tan instead of sunbathe, because its clear that shes fair skinned. Her body is great though.
Reply to this Comment
Fucking models.... you get one SI swimsuit cover, and all of the sudden you're the hottest bitch on the planet. GTFO, way hotter girls out there than her.
Reply to this Comment
she's like a Barbie doll, i tell ya...she's perfect and has a really nice bod as well!
Reply to this Comment
Very cute, super hot, whats is he like 5:10 105 lbs?? Not much to her but she photographs well But remember somewhere some guy is sick of her shit.
But the outfit WTF??? Walking around times square in a short skirt and fuck me pumps, a few years ago she would definately been thought of as a hooker....
Reply to this Comment
she's only 30?? I thought she looked older than that...
Reply to this Comment
I love her I'm constipated and tying to take a dump whilst standing pose.
Also love the different poses here.
Face is busted like Jessica simpson/desperate Dan and body is nothing special. She looks shapeless at times.
Nice leg though. Not the weird one.
Reply to this Comment
Not aging good. Why do most supermodels go down the hill quickly?
Bad skin but nice eye colour.
Reply to this Comment
According to her website she's 5'8'', 110lbs and her measurements are 34-23-35.
Height is a static measurement so assuming she's telling the truth about her height (models tend to say they're taller than they really are) then she really is 5'8''. As for weight and measurements, those can fluctuate quite a bit but I'd say they seem accurate enough. Except for one thing, her bust measurement. I don't believe her bust is only 34''. I mean, I'm a 34D which means my bust is 38'' around and her breasts are at least as big as mine, I'd say even bigger. For her bust to be 34'' around, her ribcage would be only 25/26'' around which is a really, really small ribcage and you can tell just by looking at her that she doesn't have such a small ribcage. In fact, it says on the wikipedia that she's a 34D which makes a lot more sense.
Reply to this Comment
That's not true...for a bust to be 34", your ribcage has to be about 29-29.5" as you only add 5 to the number of your band measurement to get your band size...cup size is when you subtract the number you just got from the number you get when you measure your breasts at their fullest...so if she is a D cup, the difference between her band size (after you add 5) and breast size is about 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 inches...and she isnt 5'8'' but 5'7''
Reply to this Comment
damn...I butchered it haha...here is what I meant:
"That's not true...for your bust to be 34", your ribcage has to be about 29-29.5...as you only add 5 to the number of your band measurement to get your band size (even 30" ribcage might be 34 as you round the # up or down to the nearest even numbered cup size (34 or 36)).
Cup size is when you subtract the number you get after you add 5 from the number you get when you measure your breasts at their fullest...so if she is a D cup, the difference between her band size (after you add 5) and actual breast size is about 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 inches...and she isnt 5'8'' but 5'7'' "
Reply to this Comment
only 5'7''? hmmm, yeah it is possible. then i guess we come to the conclusion that height is not a matter
Reply to this Comment
5'7'' is pretty tall for a woman, especially if she is thin and has a nice figure...it's the min requirement in the modelling word...whatever height you see or hear about a model, it is usually one inch less unless she is already tall like 5'11'' or taller...in that case, they either downgrade it or keep it as is
Reply to this Comment
well i am a girl, i am almost 5'7'' and i dont consider myself tall. neither my best girlfriend that she is 5'7,5''.
Anyway, they say minimum height 5'7'' for models but for example selita is 5'6'' (evey person that have seen her states at the internet that she is 5'6'') and kate moss... even shorter...
thats why i said height is not a matter.. the most important is the proporions and the type that a model has. (well, ok, not to be under 5'5''-5'4'' i guess....)
Reply to this Comment
I am about 5'8'' and dont consider myself tall, either unless I am in heels but people say I am tall and "so tall" in heels....when I see someone else around the same height, I consider them tall, though...5'7'' is borderline tall...when you're 5'10" or more, you look tall tall...Kate Moss is an exception to the modelling world as she became big when she was already young so her height didnt really do any harm to her (she lies about it and claims to be 5'7'', though)...but I agree about Selita...I dont know how they let her be a VS model...I guess it's her face or something or VS just needed a replacement for Tyra Banks right away
Reply to this Comment
5'8'' - 5'8,5'' its fine-really good, i also like 5'9'' and 5'10'' more than that not really, as you said they are tall tall. most men are 5'11'' - 6'. if a woman is 5'11' she cant really wear high hills, she is going to be taller than her man which for me is not nice. some men also say that is not comfortable in bed with very tall women...
I believe for selita that she is pretty and has very nice,sexy legs. They say 5'7'', but think about it - 5'6'' girls when they just wear flip flops they become 5'6,5'', so with proper shoes they are definetly in 5'7'' area and above. also 5'6'' girls (with nice bodys)dont look tiny like 5'4'' and under girls do. selita is a very nice and sexy 5'6'' so i guess thats why she is in. The same with laetitia casta, 5'6'' or 5'6,5'', on her prime she was amazing, adorable (and little i say). About kate moss, yeah, you are right. but its not only that, she was lucky because she was the exact face that calvin klein was looking for.
Reply to this Comment
hey girls, its easier... we all know that models add at least 1 inch to their height, so you have to be 5'6'' so they can list you as 5'7'' or 5'7,5''.
It funny with kate moss, everybody knows she is 5'5'' and IMG keep listing her 5'7,5''... they lie so much!
I have seen sites though listed as minimum height requirement 5'6''.
Reply to this Comment
if kate is 5'5'' and they listing her 5'7,5'' thats 2,5 inches and not 1. so its not a rule that they add just 1 inch.... they same with selita, she is 5'6'' and they list her 5'8''. it looks more likely to add 2 inches. But i do believe that the most important is if you standout and if you are expressive, height really comes second(its good to have but its not everything). The women that are very famous are because of their personality and their unique looks, not because of their height.
well if you disagree then explain me why laetitia casta, marilyn monroe, brigitte bardot, selita, marisa, kate moss, twiggy and others... did a very good career in showbizz?
when they say minimum catwalk height 5'8'' they are talking about the girls that they are the just the hangers... (yeah you prefer the tall hangers than the short) but nobody know or will ever know their names. To make a houseold name you need stong presense and alluring!
Reply to this Comment
^^^*household*
Reply to this Comment
her skin looks better here than it normally does. i like her hair and she has eyes are beautiful,
however i think those shoes are last seasons - everyone else was rocking those kicks around 3/4 months ago. unless these are old pix
Reply to this Comment
...those shoes are last seasons? wtf? are you a fag or something?? what straight man really notices shit like that?? most WOMEN wouldnt even notice that.
and who the fuck cares if somehting is "last season" if it looks good? are you supposed to throw away your beautiful and expensive shoes just because some fashion idiot said they are "so last season" and the trends are changing?
Reply to this Comment
i noticed that. He doesnt have to be gay to notice footwear. Most men on here comment on a womans feet before anything else! Apart form being last season, the shoes are gross. They look like trotters or something.
Reply to this Comment
adriana's waaaaaaayyy hotter!!!!!
Reply to this Comment
Rufus, according to her website she's 5'8'', 110lbs and her measurements are 34-23-35.
Height is a static measurement so assuming she's telling the truth about her height (models tend to say they're taller than they really are) then she really is 5'8''. As for weight and measurements, those can fluctuate quite a bit but I'd say they seem accurate enough. Except for one thing, her bust measurement. I don't believe her bust is only 34''. I mean, I'm a 34D which means my bust is 38'' around and her breasts are at least as big as mine, I'd say even bigger. For her bust to be 34'' around, her ribcage would be only 25/26'' around which is a really, really small ribcage and you can tell just by looking at her that she doesn't have such a small ribcage. In fact, it says on the wikipedia that she's a 34D which makes a lot more sense.
Reply to this Comment
She'd look so much better with brown hair
Reply to this Comment
I would love to see her as a brunette (her natural color) or even a redhead. It think she would pull both off very well.
Reply to this Comment
she wont change her hair color, because VS must fill their blond quota..
Reply to this Comment
Ya know....... You jealous bitches and gay freakin men can slice it and dice it anyway you want, but you have to realize there's a reason she was voted #1 and IS the hottest model on the planet. Pick it apart if it makes you feel better, but there ain't a "straight" man out there that wouldn't worship the ground this goddess walks on. I'd be first in line.
And thats the bottom line.........
Reply to this Comment
lol you make me laugh. Because a person expresses an opinion different to yours you label them gay or jealous? Everyone's perception of beauty is different.
And thats the bottom line.........
Reply to this Comment
Her body is perfect, I mean perfect. I think her skin is looking a lot better here. She is a really good surfer (placed second in the Kelly Slater celeb invitational) and she's just got sun damage. That's a lot of why her body is so hot too though so it's a trade off. I have seen 19 y/o guys who for real look 45 because they spend all day, every day, in the ocean. Her skin is actually doing very well for someone who has spent her whole life in the sun.
Reply to this Comment
she looks like a whore in the headlights
Reply to this Comment
damn! super hot! damn!! i called "crazy hot" still... but still, i am chicago cubs fan... not the new york mets, cause they suck ass
Reply to this Comment
This woman is magnanimously HOT and beautiful in person. Tall as a goddess. Those freaking legs are sooooo long. I'd love to keep her for the weekend.
Reply to this Comment
hot chick...not looking her best here though...that lipstick color is ugly and matte.
Reply to this Comment
30 going on 50. My grandma has younger looking skin than this troll.
Reply to this Comment
I don't like her face but her body is rockin'!
Reply to this Comment
Her face actually looks so much better than normal. Wow. I am now a Marissa Miller fan.
Reply to this Comment
damn i wish i was blessed with a long torso instead of v.long legs. im serious. that is what this girl has and they can always, always look heaps skinnier than us long legged girls because all the stuff in the middle stretches out. I was given the k.k body. short torso, long legs, wide hips. everyone goes on about my legs but i'd much rather have been born with a long torso they look so much better, also i would be able to squeeze my hip bones into size 2 jeans which I cannot ever do because my hip bones are too wide. shame.
Reply to this Comment
She looks perfect here. Her skin is slightly dodgy, but she's still one of the hottest women around at the minute. What a body!
Reply to this Comment
Her Body is damn damn damn damn Hot!!!!!hotter than ever my dearest lima and ms bunchen.i should admit. but i never like her face.. ever..
Reply to this Comment
Kudos for wearin' a lined skirt. Women's legs look extra sexy when you get a peek of the satin.
Reply to this Comment
Dear Mr. President,
As your 2nd term comes to an end could you please do the American people a huge favor before you leave office. Would you name Marisa Miller's legs as a national treasure. sexiest legs around, even if some say they're short. whatever!
Reply to this Comment
Her body is a 10 but her face is like a 5. Her face will not age well.
Reply to this Comment
she is lovely, juicy and ofcourse sexy!
Reply to this Comment
Marisa Miller is a butterface. She has a nice ass and a leatherface.
Reply to this Comment
Marissa is at tops 5'6.5. Google Marissa Miller height. Everyone that has met her say;'s shes between 5'5 and 5'6. She pulls of the the illusion of being tall because she is so thin.
Reply to this Comment
Make a Scandalous Comment
Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.
Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!