33 Scandalous Comments

Pic #6 - look at the fat belly roll hanging over her pink panties. Blech! Why are they all bruised up? I don't think they are 10's by ANY means!

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:19pm
Reply to this Comment

Who are these HOE's anyways??

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:23pm
Reply to this Comment

Yeah, who the hell are these nasty bitches. Definitely run-of-the mill. Hotness scale=3

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:28pm
Reply to this Comment

OUT OF 1000

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:32pm
Reply to this Comment

Fat chicks make me want to vomit. Damn, there goes breakfast. And my stomach has reserved the right to get rid of lunch as soon as I eat it. Two tons of fun. Wasn't that a singing group?

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:45pm
Reply to this Comment

Well...the fat brunette isn't so bad.....On a really, and I mean Really bad night I might. Nah, nights just don't get that bad in my house.

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:47pm
Reply to this Comment

For some reason the blond one reminds me of Lonnie Anderson. Maybe it's the I don't have a brain in my head look about her.

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:52pm
Reply to this Comment

are these Amsterdam "workers"? they have that look.

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 9:10pm
Reply to this Comment

>>> I don’t think they are 10’s by ANY means!

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 11:47pm
Reply to this Comment

It's sad when they have to try that hard for attention.

Saturday, April 1st, 2006 @ 2:43am
Reply to this Comment

The brunette would blatantly get fucked like the cheap british ho she is.

Saturday, April 1st, 2006 @ 1:19pm
Reply to this Comment

the blond chick looks like a 53 year old stripper
she should do us all a favor and shave her head an go live in a cave somewhere

Saturday, April 1st, 2006 @ 3:09pm
Reply to this Comment

Wow Lucy pinder (the brunette) sure looks different to how the magazines show her! They show her as a slender, big breasted brunette with a body to die for, here she looks as though shes never heard of the word "excercise" , I mean, for a model, she really should not have an overhanging and flabby belly complete with flabby, cellulite infested thighs and ass.

Monday, April 3rd, 2006 @ 8:17am
Reply to this Comment

Lucy may be a bit soft but not fat by any means. I think she is just perefct the way she is.

Thursday, April 6th, 2006 @ 11:45am
Reply to this Comment

They don't look as good in these pics as they do in the glossy magazine photoshoots but I think you are going too far in saying they are unattractive. And to comment on a minor detail like sock imprints on the ankles, POTTYMOUTH, is simply juvenile. Why do you have to inspect every tiny imperfection on a woman? Does it make you feel like more of a man? At least now I know that even models get ripped to shreds by men's comments, not just normal girls like myself who mind their own business and get abusive comments said to them by men in the street. You should be ashamed of yourself for your crappy attitude to women.

Sunday, April 9th, 2006 @ 8:13pm
Reply to this Comment

btw if you do an internet search for lucy pinder and michelle marsh you will find loads of BEAUTIFUL and STUNNING pics of them. no-one looks perfect all of the time and these pics arnt a fair example of the girls so check out the ones where they look so GORGEOUS that you guys would be too INTIMIDATED to approach them if you saw them. either that or you haters need to upload a pic of yourselves so we can all pick at your appearance and examine your wrinkles and bellies and elasticated clothing marks!!x!!

Sunday, April 9th, 2006 @ 8:48pm
Reply to this Comment

Ya'll call christan millian FAT these girls look FATTER than her!

Sunday, April 16th, 2006 @ 2:15pm
Reply to this Comment

wtf both ov these wud get boned u americans want anorexic sluts these 2 r perfect the way they r

Monday, May 8th, 2006 @ 4:02pm
Reply to this Comment

By the logic of most of those commenting here, if these girls are "fat," then that would make an Ethiopian lady suffering from severe malnutrition look "attractive." Seriously, when did looking like a Ukraine Famine victim suddenly become sexy, or are you all so zombied-out on unrefined grain alcohol and paint-thinner that you've lost all sense of proportion, not to mention beauty? The tiny-ass bitches you nerds get off to probably have eating disorders you've never heard of.

Wednesday, August 30th, 2006 @ 4:47am
Reply to this Comment

WHAT!? Neither of those girls is even close to being fat. Ok, they don't look anorexic but I think it's a good thing. Kalafan is absolutely right.

Saturday, September 16th, 2006 @ 11:14am
Reply to this Comment

Wow, came across this site for LP pics and stumbled upon this interesting debate as to whether these 2 young ladies are "fat" - I can only agree with the sentiments of the last 2 comments; what the fuk are you peeps on about thinking these 2 are fat!!?? Totally refreshing with a natural figure in proportion which looks great. Must be remembered most men are really hardly in any position to cast "judgement" with the state the majority keep their bodies in...

Geta grip people!

Friday, December 29th, 2006 @ 10:33pm
Reply to this Comment

Yeah like the last few comments! These women ain't fat, to those who don't know, this is called 'Healthy weight', you need some fat! Besides i think i would much rather see a bit of extra skin than aload of bones to put it simply, Bones = UGLY! Fat = Ok . Anyway what are boobs, fat and a bit of other stuff, people like that so being stick thin doesn't promote big boobs so ha :p

Friday, January 26th, 2007 @ 6:20pm
Reply to this Comment

I agree with Kalafan. Anyone thinking Lucy Pinder or Michelle look anywhere near fat are seriously f*cked in the head. Ever screw a skinny chick and get bruises from her pelvic bone? I'd much rather bang a chick that is built for comfort. Hell, I think those two would look loads better with 10+kilos on 'em!

Saturday, January 27th, 2007 @ 12:36pm
Reply to this Comment

I know for a fact that Lucy Pinder has got a nasty spare tyre around her middle, I have seen her at a car magazine stand, holding it in for pics. Whether she is normal or fat is open to debate, some might argue that it is normal and attractive for a girl to have some excess body fat. Personally I do not find it attractive, I would not say she is seriously overweight to the point of being a risk to her health though. My sister does modelling work, and I know for a fact that most of these pictures in magazines have been worked on with imaging packages such as Photoshop to make the girls look better. My sister even says that sometimes she hardly recognises herself after the pics have been edited, eg, making her look thinner, airbrushing spots, and cellulite etc. Therefore to suggest that magazine pics are proof of beauty is inaccurate.

Monday, January 29th, 2007 @ 5:14am
Reply to this Comment

lucy pinder is jst so fit tho, i blatenly wouldnt ever say no to her, although i have to agree the belly on pic 6 is a bit off putting, but still she is so hot. and they arn't really that fat at all just look at some of there other pics on the internet

Saturday, June 16th, 2007 @ 5:43pm
Reply to this Comment

LUCY PINDER IS STUNNING I LOVE HER, I LOVE HER CURVY ASS AND THIGHS AND MASSIVE TITS, FEW MORE POUNDS THE BETTER FUCKING GORGEOUS SEXY AS HELL, GOD I WISH I COULD MEET HER!!!!

Saturday, September 29th, 2007 @ 5:38am
Reply to this Comment

WTF is wrong with you ppl?

these women are tittylicious, you'd be in there like a heartbeat if you had the chance.

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008 @ 1:34pm
Reply to this Comment

lovin pic 6, lucy pinder u r special!

Friday, February 8th, 2008 @ 11:44am
Reply to this Comment

If the dark haired one exercised a bit she would be really hot. Not too many people want to put in the effort though, when it would really help their health and appearance.

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:19pm
Reply to this Comment

"I don’t think they are 10’s by ANY means!"

(Whoops, shoildn't have used less-than signs.)

Their shirts say "We are 10!" They're 5 each.

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 11:48pm
Reply to this Comment

also the we r 10 is 4 the magazine they r modelin 4 the magazine loaded is 10 yrs old n ur rite there not 10s there 11s

Monday, May 8th, 2006 @ 4:04pm
Reply to this Comment

GAWD! In pic 3 she has back fat hanging over too. One more thing...obviously they weren't to prepped on this little photo shoot as in pic 6 the blond one has lines around her ankles where her socks were fitting snuggly. Nice Touch!

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:21pm
Reply to this Comment

NOT TO BAD, ive seen worse..... BUT THEY ARE NO LISA S!!!!!!!! SHE IS HOT>>>..

I like how in picts 6, the burnett has the belly roll over, then in pict 7 you can see her TOTALLY suckin it in.... hahahaha...... SUCK THAT GUT IN BITCH!!!!

Friday, March 31st, 2006 @ 1:22pm
Reply to this Comment

Make a Scandalous Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

Please note: Do not use multiple nicknames & leave annoying, pointless comments that only attack other Bastardly Visitors. Also, blatant racial & sexual slurs for no particular reason will not be condoned. BREAK THE RULES: YOU WILL BE BANNED & appeals via email will not be considered. Before you comment, please be aware that no comments will be edited or deleted. Ever.

Lastly, if you have special scoop (i.e. scandalous photos, bastardly ex-girlfriends & boyfriends you want to expose, etc etc), please do contact us directly. You will remain anonymous!