Ha! You and I are not so different! I have lamentably mistaken you for another, just as you have done with me.
I will tell you I am no philosopher, nor have I read any philosophy. I don't feel the need. Don't we all live the same life? Why do I need the impressions and interpretations of another when I can experience the same on my own? From that alone I understand Nietzsche. I understand his pleasure and pain, triumphs and failures, titlation and torment.
But don't take my disinterest in philosophy as a criticism of you. The reason for my disinterest is the same as the reason for your seeming interest. It is all the same; it is simply humanity.
Still, from that you ask how I can criticize you and question your own knowledge. How can I not? How can you question hotpocket's opinion? But how can you not? It is all the same. We both came here for the same reason; we both argue with the same purpose; we both point out each other's hypocrisy and failure in reason with the same intent. We both contort ourselves under the impetus of the other. But for what? For TRUTH? For KNOWLEDGE? Hardly.
Go ahead and analyze me and tell me why I say these things. With your knowledge I am confident you are capable of that. But then analyze yourself and tell yourself why you say what you say. And then alalyze that self and tell yourself why that self says those things. And then let the loop repeat itself forever. It is all the same; there is no escaping your humanity.
But I don't wish to start another fracas. You have mistaken my words for sarcasm; I wrote them in earnest. Posts of your kind will render little discourse, as already shown by hotpocket. But if you no longer wish to communicate with me then I will leave you to your silence. But know that the "insult" I wrote in quotes was meant as a hypothetical; it was not meant to offend. And you are right: I am not hung like a horse. That was the part where I mentioned my insecurity about my virility.
Ha! You and I are not so different! I have lamentably mistaken you for another, just as you have done with me.
I will tell you I am no philosopher, nor have I read any philosophy. I don't feel the need. Don't we all live the same life? Why do I need the impressions and interpretations of another when I can experience the same on my own? From that alone I understand Nietzsche. I understand his pleasure and pain, triumphs and failures, titlation and torment.
But don't take my disinterest in philosophy as a criticism of you. The reason for my disinterest is the same as the reason for your seeming interest. It is all the same; it is simply humanity.
Still, from that you ask how I can criticize you and question your own knowledge. How can I not? How can you question hotpocket's opinion? But how can you not? It is all the same. We both came here for the same reason; we both argue with the same purpose; we both point out each other's hypocrisy and failure in reason with the same intent. We both contort ourselves under the impetus of the other. But for what? For TRUTH? For KNOWLEDGE? Hardly.
Go ahead and analyze me and tell me why I say these things. With your knowledge I am confident you are capable of that. But then analyze yourself and tell yourself why you say what you say. And then alalyze that self and tell yourself why that self says those things. And then let the loop repeat itself forever. It is all the same; there is no escaping your humanity.
But I don't wish to start another fracas. You have mistaken my words for sarcasm; I wrote them in earnest. Posts of your kind will render little discourse, as already shown by hotpocket. But if you no longer wish to communicate with me then I will leave you to your silence. But know that the "insult" I wrote in quotes was meant as a hypothetical; it was not meant to offend. And you are right: I am not hung like a horse. That was the part where I mentioned my insecurity about my virility.
Reply to this Comment