JUST TO PUT THIS TO REST ONCE AND FOR ALL - Both dresses, by Roberto Cavalli, were made with CORSET BODICES to hold the material right onto a woman's form. Both dresses and attached corsets have SNAP-ON ATTACHMENTS AT THE CROTCH to keep the corset from buckling at the waist. What you see is the "flesh-coloured" support of the corset (you can ask a Cavalli rep yourself, and yes, "flesh-coloured" means "to match Caucasian skin").
NO, SHE WAS NOT WEARING A PAD, the corset attachment is actually being worn over her own thong underwear which is causing it to bulk up. The "stain" everyone keeps talking about was added in postwork to the photo - some people have too much time on their hands.
NO, IT WAS NOT WINDY ON EITHER DAY - the producers wanted a fan blowing to keep the smoke from the pyrotechnics from crowding the stage (didn't decide to post pictures of those sparks in the background, did anybody?). The fans were NOT RUN DURING REHEARSAL so Toni and her production team were not aware that it would be there during the performance that evening. In fact, the fan wasn't even on stage until that night. The later excuse to Toni's team was that there was some kind of "language barrier".
The pink dress is actually split quite high, but usually stays closed further down - however, it simply was not made for performance. Also, no one mentions that the breast showing didn't happen during the performance at all (which was televised), the photo was snapped as she was just exiting the field and she raised her arms to wave to fans.
Come on, people. Why must our minds go right for the worst scenarios?

Friday, June 16th, 2006 @ 7:03am
Reply to this Comment

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <strong> <em> <a> <u> <img> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <center> <tt>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options