Kim Kardashian Went Shopping & To Starbucks!
Friday, July 4th, 2008 in the middle of the damn afternoon
...and who says that's not a photo opportunity!So yesterday we reported that Kim claims she's 120lbs. The comments were mixed when believing 120lbs to be legit. So let's have a poll to determine if the readers can really believe the stuff Kim blogs on her site.
Related in a Bastardly way:
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Kim Kardashian Hits Up Starbucks!
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Kim Kardashian NOT A Cheap Bastard! Gives Homeless Man $20!
- Kim Kardashian Went Shopping At Traffic!
- Bastardly Breaking News!! Kim Kardashian Shops on Robertson Blvd!!
- Bastardly Breaking News! Kim Kardashian Superstar wears a black bra under her black dress!












This broad is getting fatter by the day. Guess Reggie is a chubby chaser
Reply to this Comment
WTF is up with those paparazzi? can't they read!!!
anywho, Kim looks great here
Reply to this Comment
Put her in white spandex shorts and you could show a movie on her ass.
Reply to this Comment
120 lbs?? Yeah, in her dreams. Just like Jennifer Love Hewitt claiming she's a size 2. You mean, 2XX, my dear.
Reply to this Comment
:D :D yup you are right!
i am 5`6 and 120 lbs and i almost like half of her
if shes under 5`0 then maybe i am wrong
p.s-i dont think that shes fat , shes healty beautifull women.
So its stupid tu lie about weight
Reply to this Comment
*healthy
*beautiful
Reply to this Comment
Saddlebags belong on a horse, not a woman.
Reply to this Comment
PLEASE DON'T GET SKINNIER!
/KiKa is a modern day goddess
Reply to this Comment
120 or 130 i still love lookin at that ass
Reply to this Comment
oh my fucking god...she acts like she is some A lister that is sick of bing followed around when it is the complete opposite!!! she skipped people at starbucks saying i am in a rush cuz papz are waiting outside, and she wears these t-shirts? LMAO
yeah, 120 lbs....my assssssssss
Reply to this Comment
D, you're very sexy, how much do you weigh? 95 lbs?
Reply to this Comment
110 lbs on a bad day...if i pig out, about 115-116 lbs
Reply to this Comment
5 or 6 lbs is hardly pigging out lol. And if it goes to your booty/thighs/hips area, it's very good.
Reply to this Comment
true but i almost never gain weight so if gain that 5-6 lbs, i literally have to pig out...and yes, it all goes to my butt area and boobs so it is all good lol
Reply to this Comment
so TO* gain
Reply to this Comment
120, 130, 140, 160 i dont give a shit, she's fucking fine
Reply to this Comment
That ass is just amazing....what ever the weight is..just hipnotic n fabulous!!
Reply to this Comment
That ass is just amazing....what ever the weight is..just hipnotic n fabulous!!
Reply to this Comment
Altough 120 lbs is big for 5'2 it's really well-placed on Kim. I mean, some girls her height look fat at 100 lbs. That is one fertile slut.
Reply to this Comment
she's 5'2, so I believe that she really weighs 120. I'd say 125.
Reply to this Comment
read what the shirt says and enjoy more expressive t-shirts at enctees.com.
Reply to this Comment
Yeah, if she's 5'2", then I could see 120 lbs. That's 10lbs for every inch over 5', when what's considered within an average medically acceptable range is roughly between 3 to 7lbs for every inch over 5'.
Reply to this Comment
Those jeans are so tight I wonder how she manages to move.
Reply to this Comment
I don’t think the girl is fat – just thicke ‘ems and nope still over 120 even without the ass cause you have to add Reggie’s weight cause he’s always up her ass… like I said she dresses him when they go out nuff said.
Reply to this Comment
Where do you get those type of jeans? I've seen a lot of Latin girls wear really tight jeans that make their ass look big and round not flat like most jeans such as Seven for all Mankind. What a stupid name for a jean?!.
Reply to this Comment
Perfect, and she probably is 120 pounds. Not like her legs or waist are really thick here, and she's 5'3" at best. She has a 110 pound body with extra in the ass and tits.
Reply to this Comment
Don't agree with the "perfect", but I think she might be 120 lbs. She's really short.
Reply to this Comment
I bet McPerv would stick his tongue up Kim's filthy ass. ewww
Reply to this Comment
I bet that you would your tongue up McPerv's perverted ass. ewwwww
Reply to this Comment
Those zippers look happy.
Reply to this Comment
I personally believe that she IS 120 pounds! She's only 5'2". I am comparing her to me and I am 5'7" and I weigh 125. (By the way, fuck EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU WHO HAVE CHALLENGED ME ON THIS. You can kiss my white ass.)
So, judging by that, she looks very good for only being 5 pounds less than me yet 5 inches shorter. I think they say to add/subtract 5 pounds per inch of height to achieve similar body proportions so I would think she would look bigger at that height/weight than she does.
Kim's a curvy girl who looks good (although I have moments when I wonder about the authenticity of her ass). Yes, she will have to watch it throughout life with her weight but she has some crazy beautiful curves! She's not supermodel skinny, nor will she ever be.
Reply to this Comment
Well said. I agree 100%. She's gorgeous with beautiful curves. But, I don't like her butt.
Reply to this Comment
Her butt is cool but it's like a freak of nature. I think she has great boobs, a truly beautiful face and a good hip to waist ratio. She's got the whole hourglass thing going on.
Reply to this Comment
Her butt looks okay in tight dresses and jeans. It's freaky-looking in sweatpants. She needs to steer clear of sweatpants. She's a beautiful girl, and I love her figure. She carries the weight very well.
Reply to this Comment
I agree that she looks 120, but I have to say that I'm not good with the whole height-weight ratio. To me she doesn't look fat, but that's my opinion. Also my opinion, I'll kiss your white ass if you want. Hahaaaa...I'm drunk.
Reply to this Comment
You're a sweet guy, Jack. Thank you.
I agree that Kim looks good and why does it even matter how much she weighs as long as she looks in proportion and healthy (i.e. not obese or too thin)?
Reply to this Comment
You know folks have gotta find somethin' to bitch about when it comes to Kim. If she were a boxer, weight would matter, but she isn't, so it doesn't.
Reply to this Comment
Ummm, OK. :D
Reply to this Comment
Bare it and sell raffle tickets. I am fairly certain many Bastardly men here would like a chance at kissing your fine, white, azz.
Reply to this Comment
She's around five feet tall, that's about right.
Reply to this Comment
She's about 145lbs. Her legs/ass alone weigh 120
Reply to this Comment
That wasn't funny, you're obviously a virgin.
Reply to this Comment
I love Kim, who cares how much she weighs.
Reply to this Comment
who cares how much she ways she is still stunning nothing wrong with how she looks better than them stupid skinny women that dont EATN!!!!
Reply to this Comment
That idea that thin women don't eat isn't exactly accurate. I'm 5'' taller than Kim Kardashian and weigh 5 pounds less that what she supposedly weighs yet I eat a lot. I eat so much my boyfriend often wonders how it's possible for me to eat like that. After all, I eat more than he does and he's 6' tall and weighs 178lbs. While I know from experience that I can spend an entire year eating junk food all the time and not exercising without gaining any weight (or body fat), I do have a very healthy lifestyle nowadays. Not so much in order to lose weight but because I want to age as gracefully and healthily as possible and the sooner one starts taking care of one's body the better. I eat a lot but what I eat is so healthy I don't even like junk food anymore. Of course, I eat unhealthy stuff as well. For instance, I have a thing for croissants and if I didn't control myself I'd eat one everyday (I limit myself to 2 per week).
What I mean to say with all this is that it is possible to eat and be thin. You either have a metabolism like mine or you eat lots of healthy food.
Reply to this Comment
I'm sorry but you're a fucking tool.
Reply to this Comment
Ha ha.
Reply to this Comment
120lbs, 140lbs, who cares she's still a good look.
Reply to this Comment
personally, i don't give a shit how much she weighs, how big her ass is, or how much weight is in her boobs. i don't care. but reading over all of your posts, you certainly do.
Reply to this Comment
love that T shirt though! I found it, emperors new clothes, they also did please dont feed the models, well funny!
www.enctees.com enjoy!
Reply to this Comment
@ comment #41 - Oh goodness, you're one of those bitches that "claim" to eat a lot but pick/stare at your food. I hate bitches like you because you want people to compliment how could you possibly eat so much and not gain weight. I know you're anorexic or is a gym fiend. Loser!
Reply to this Comment
I take it you're referring to "nick (Uncertified Bastard)". When someone comes behind you and replies, ahead of your comment, it throws the numbering off.
And whether or not she is "one of those bitches", I hate 'em, too. There's nothin' that pisses me off more than takin' a babe out for a meal, only to sit there and watch her pick thru her food like there's a land mine in it or somethin'. If you're not fuckin' hungry, just order an appetizer or go to the salad bar, Dammit!! Food ain't cheap!
Disclaimer: There's plenty that pisses me off more than that, but I'm just sayin'.
Reply to this Comment
I take that back... I see it wasn't "nick (Uncertified Bastard)" you were referring to... we still cool though, Andromeda18_, aren't we? Just don't waste my money at the crab shack. ;)
Reply to this Comment
The girl is hot, she should be a model for Christian Louboutin, when Christian signs up Kim , he needs to sign up Hallery too. Weight thing, WTF those little girls with nice asses don't weight much of nothing. Now you little pencil neck little fellows might have a little trouble with 120lbs when you weight only 150lbs wet.HaHaHa
Reply to this Comment
Maybe I'm "one of those bitches that "claim" to eat a lot but pick/stare at my food" or maybe you just need to believe there's no such thing as a thin person who actually eats. I'm thin, I eat and I love it. I love to cook and eat the food I cook, it's one of the things I enjoy doing the most. And yes, I workout (3-5 times a week) but I don't even go to a gym, I have better things to do with my money. I wasn't looking for compliments just annoyed by the fact that many people seem to think the world only has 2 types of people, the ones who don't eat and are thin and the ones who are fat but actually eat. That's just not true, no matter how much that might make some people feel bad about themselves.
Reply to this Comment
My dad eats like a horse and can't gain weight, so I know what you mean. He's always been like that. He drinks protein shakes to help him gain weight. My sister was the same way. I didn't luck out and get that gene. I got the curves.
Reply to this Comment
Rhonda, IMO, getting the curves IS lucking out... within reason, of course. ;)
Reply to this Comment
Well, yeah, but I have to watch what I eat and that bugs the crap out of me. I also didn't inherit the height in my family. But, I got boobs, a butt, a crazy laugh, & a charming personality...so what can I say?!? I just work with what God gave me.
Thanks! ;)
Reply to this Comment
I feel you on that, A. I know some babes, much like yourself, who will shut an all-you-can-eat buffet down, hardly work out and never look like they've gained a pound.... None of them are thin or skinny, but they're not fat, either.
Reply to this Comment
im in love with everything about this woman
Reply to this Comment
Oh I do believe that a thin person actually eats and not be fat. I just don't believe you and what you said..."While I know from experience that I can spend an entire year eating junk food all the time and not exercising without gaining any weight (or body fat)..." You probably spent a lot of time in the bathroom then. Also, that's fine if you love to eat but why brag about eating and not gaining weight? What? Do you want an applaud?
Reply to this Comment
This woman is disgusting. How could anyone find this slob attractive?
She is a stumpy cow and I feel sick to my stomach every time I look at pictures of her.
It's unacceptable for a young woman who hasn't had any children to be this big, especially a woman with Kim Kardashian's money. She could afford a live-in private chef, nutritionist, and private trainer to help her stay in shape but she doesn't so she must be a very very lazy and unproductive person.
This woman needs to lose AT LEAST 20 lbs and put on about 5 lbs of muscle tone. Her body is so fat and shapeless. I hate how people say she has curves because ANYONE would have curves if they were overweight like Kim; Those aren't curves, they're fat deposits. Her whole body is jiggly and unattractive... Real curves should be tight, firm, and toned.
Buns of steel NOT jello.
Get this fat bitch out of here!
Reply to this Comment
Sorry sweetie but maybe you should take your 12-year-old boy-looking ass out of here. Calling a woman who is clearly a normal weight "overweight" is not going to make your man any less likely to cheat on you. It's basic biology. Child-bearing hips = where a man wants to put his dick.
Reply to this Comment
Not all men. I don't like fat chicks and can't stand women with big ol' child bearing hips and "juicy" asses. I prefer slender skinny girls with perky A/B cups and narrow waists/hips (see: Ziyi Zhang, Rachel Bilson).
Different people have different preferences.
Reply to this Comment
You can argue that you like boy-shaped girls all you want, hell I agree with you, you probably do and thus are a closeted homosexual (btw, it IS possible to be thin and have hips, you are saying you prefer women without them which implies you prefer your women to look like men, much like the gay men who run the fashion industry). That doesn't change the fact that pretty much all stick-thin women I've seen who are famous and the ones I've encountered in real time (Nicky Hilton, Liz Hurley, Sienna Miller, Victoria Beckham) have been cheated on with curvier women. I still say straight men like hips because reality has shown me this.
Reply to this Comment
And because countless studies have pointed to men's preference for a certain hip-to-waist ratio which, once again, you say you prefer to look like straight up and down like a man's body. You're right, you have a personal preference and that's cool but you're not most men, you are a closet homosexual.
Reply to this Comment
hips do denote femininity, i dont think anyone can argue with that. Like you say, you can be thin and have hips. I find straight up and down bodies on women to be really unattractive. I think hips are more important than breasts when it comes to having a womanly silouette (or however its spelled) because even women who have big breasts but no hips manage to look boyish to me.
Reply to this Comment
That's the funniest thing I've read all day. So, by your reasoning, every heterosexual man that likes say, an asian woman, is actually gay because they don't have child birthing hips? Seriously, do you do comedy as a career? If not, you should. You're hilarious.
Reply to this Comment
So you are implying that all Asian women are curve-free and have the bodies of young boys? Nice. I'm sure they'd love that kind of flattery from a guy like you (lol)
Reply to this Comment
Comparitively speaking. If you compare Ziyi Zhang to Kim K, there is a huge difference. Look, you like curvy women with big asses, that's fantastic. More power to you. To call somebody gay because they don't like women with huge asses is just asinine. And you used the young boy analogy, not me. But I'm done arguing with you. Have a nice day.
Reply to this Comment
*comparatively
Reply to this Comment
You're also being a presumptive dickhead because I don't have an ideal body type. If anything, I just think women should look healthy and like women, that means no fatties, and no hip-free glorified boys with tits. Everything in-between is fine whether you look like Kimmy K, Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Biel, Rachel Bilson or Marisa Miller.
Reply to this Comment
Presumptive? Do you mean presumptive like calling me gay because I don't like women with huge asses attractive, presumptive? Which is ironic really since this site posts primarily pictures of women, which if anything, and considering you're a woman, calls into question your sexual preferences more than mine. But I wouldn't want to be that presumptive.
Reply to this Comment
You never said anything about Kim's ass initially, what I called into question was your stated preference for straight women with narrow hips (you then went on to express a preference for Rachel Bilson who is 5'3" and curvy.) I was pointing out that straight men are drawn to a certain hip-to-waist ratio and gay men have a stated preference for more straight, masculine bodies, which you have yet to provide even any anecdotal evidence to the contrary. This does not disclude women who may be more petite or thin. If what you actually meant is that you don't like curvy asses, then that is what you should have said.
Reply to this Comment
I never said anything about huge asses. You are just being a presumptive dickhead. Hips and asses are completely different things. Young, fertile women of all ethnicities can have curvaceous hips. You're the one who said you prefer your women without them. Is it my fault if your idea of a woman's ideal body type is what gay men describe as ideal as well?
Reply to this Comment
If I'm being presumptive, why are you taking offense and calling me gay then? I said I prefer women with narrows waists and who are slender, like models, not women carrying around 50lbs of fat on their asses and showing it off like it's some sort of accomplishment. For whatever reason, you got bent about that and started calling me gay. Please. If that makes me gay, then damn, there are a whole hell of a lot of gay men posting here.
Reply to this Comment
No actually, you did not say anything about her ass until just now, when you obviously only did so to take a potshot at me, because as I pointed out before, you are a dickhead. Did I not JUST SAY Marisa Miller has an enviable body? Is she not a model? Once again, (the mentally slow do require repetition), hips and asses are not the same thing. You said you prefer women to not have them. The vast majority of straight men do not. Hence my assumption that you are gay. But y'know what? Something like 3% of straight men say they also like hipless women, so perhaps u are among them. Speaking of which, have you seen Jordan's husband, Peter Andre? Yeah, straight men like that.
Reply to this Comment
3% of straight men? Care to link your source? Oh that's right, you just pulled that number out of your ass. You're boring and full of shit. But I'm sure glad you're so concerned with my sexuality. Comforting. Again, you being a woman browsing a site that posts pictures of sexy and scantily clad women, who is gay, me or you? If I was posting daily on youngstuds.com, you might have an argument. Sorry to say, but it's the other way around. Stupid bitch.
Reply to this Comment
"Stupid bitch."
Spoken like a straight up batty bwoy.
Buju say:
Reply to this Comment
Dude, why so defensive? Did I just walk in on your fantasy of Chase Crawford or something? hahaha You wouldn't be so angry if you had nothing to hide.
Also, there are a lot of girls on this site and I don't think you'll be making any new friends hahahahaha
Reply to this Comment
ROFL.
Oh god. The "if you don't like women with hips, you're gay" argument again. Tell me sugar, are you also of the "if you like a woman who shaves her pubic hair, you're really a pedophile because it's clear you like little girls" mind set as well?
Reply to this Comment
I'm gonna let that one go because it's obvious that you don't know what you're talking about. You straight-looking women like... Rachel Bilson? LOL nice example. She's got a great body WITH FAMOUSLY CURVACEOUS HIPS. In fact, her curves are so famous they prompted Mischa Barton to say in an interview she would not want curves like Rachel's because they are too "in-your-face sexy," she prefers her version of sexiness which is more "subtle," which led to rumors of a rift between them, etc. This is your example of liking a boyish bod? http://www.classicbilson.net/rachel-bilson-pictures/Rachel-Bilson-cute-s...
I think you should start using Katie Price (Jordan) and Tara Reid as your examples instead.
Reply to this Comment
I am boyish. See me swing my hips. http://www.classicbilson.net/rachel-bilson-pictures/Tight-Jeans-and-Leat...
Reply to this Comment
Once again, you can be skinny, and have curves. The hip-to-waist ratio attraction, cannot be denied.
Reply to this Comment
I am boyish. See me swing my hips. http://www.classicbilson.net/rachel-bilson-pictures/Tight-Jeans-and-Leat...
Reply to this Comment
And the "basic biology" argument is completely flawed. If I were in fact living in the Middle Paleolithic period and hadn't fully developed my frontal lobe yet, I might agree with you. Today, biology will get you a few steps in the right direction, but that's about it.
Reply to this Comment
The same media/paparazzi who puts Victoria Beckham [skinny,alien]¹[skinny,sexy]², Hayden Panettiere [midget]¹[stacked]², Fergie [butta]¹[almost butta]², and Adriana Lima [perfection]¹[cute, but not all that]² on blast, puts Kim Kardashian [fat]¹[not at all fat, and hot as hell]² on blast. Why are all of these differing, widely accepted standards of beauty constantly thrown in our faces, if the likes of one of them denotes a "Middle Paleolithic period" mindset? Anyone who feels they must negatively label any trains of thought not in agreement with their own, is prehistoric... like your basic racist.
@ 8:54pm, you said, "Different people have different preferences."
@ 8:59pm you contradicted the fuck out of your agreement with that statement. So, whose frontal lobe hasn't developed yet?
--
¹Opinion of most Bastardly users, as I perceive them.
²My opinion.
Reply to this Comment
Saying that it's not "basic biology" to like women with big hips doesn't contradict my statement saying that different people can like different things. My point was that preference isn't governed simply by instinct, i.e., some sort of survival/Darwin notion that the base animal brain is simply driven by visual cues derived from viewing a "fertile" woman. Apparently that's somehow insulting to you though because you felt the need to throw in some personal insults.
Reply to this Comment
What personal insults? I simply turned what you said back on you. Middle Paleolithic period = prehistoric. You're the one who insulted differences, which is what is contradictory.
Reply to this Comment
"So, whose frontal lobe hasn't developed yet?"
Those.
Again, where did I insult differences? Actually, don't bother to answer that. Reading comprehension obviously isn't your forte.
Reply to this Comment
"If I were in fact living in the Middle Paleolithic period and hadn't fully developed my frontal lobe yet, I might agree with you."
Ring a bell?
Reply to this Comment
Ah, the crux of it! See, here is where we are having our misunderstanding. That's not meant to be read as an insult. Early man didn't have complex cognitive processes and wasn't able to override lower brain function the way you and I can. Thus my statement. If you or I didn't have a frontal lobe, we would be driven to choose our mates simply by basic biological programming and nothing else. I mean, I guess that's insulting to our distant ancestors, but it wasn't meant to be insulting to anybody on this site. Peace.
Reply to this Comment
Reply to this Comment
Ah, so you're just a dick then. I tried explaining it to you and going the extra mile to be nice. Go fuck a fat girl and piss off then buddy.
Reply to this Comment
Different people have different preferences.
Amen Goliano.
Reply to this Comment
I think she is very attractive. I'm just going to put that out there. Kim K looks as a woman SHOULD look - curvy. Any woman saying she looks like a cow is the shapeless, lanky pre-pubescent boy type who gets cheated on with curvier women (think: David Beckham, Jude Law). My problem is primarily with her attitude. She seems to ditzy and Paris-like. But she thinks she's sexy and she has absolutely every reason to - she is. Also, there's a picture of her ass coming out of a pool and there's not a lick of cellulite on there, which is uncommon for an ass so round. Frankly, her body is enviable.
Reply to this Comment
Her figure is very enviable. She seems proportionate. Her boobs and hips are big, but her waist is rather small. Rose McGowan had a similar figure when she was younger (in Scream, etc.) and she was praised for her curves. Hell, Kim's got it; she may as well flaunt it. She won't have it forever.
I think some people are jaded by the way she became famous, and they can't see past that. If she became famous in a more traditional way, then I don't think she would have as many negative comments about her looks.
As far as her spoiled attitude goes, I blame her upbringing. That mother of hers is a spoiled child herself. I'm actually surprised the girls turned out as good as they have. That woman is a freaking lunatic.
Reply to this Comment
I actually knew about Kim before the sex tape... from her being photographed out with Paris. I think it's her physical appearance that made her famous, beyond that and before the RayJay tape. And not just her ass, it's that plus her gorgeous face, hair, and everything else.
As to her attitude, it's no different than anyone else's in her position. At least she's real with it. Hell, two-thirds of the female posters on here exhibit the same.
Reply to this Comment
"You probably spent a lot of time in the bathroom then."
Well, actually... I better not go there.
You don't have to believe that I can eat junk food, not exercise and not gain weight. I didn't ask you to believe me. I know the truth about that and that's all that matters to me. And as I said before I wasn't bragging or looking for compliments, I was merely presenting myself as an example of someone who eats a lot and doesn't gain weight. If I wanted to brag I would've said that despite being thin, nature was rather generous with me as far as womanly attributes go. That's bragging!
Reply to this Comment
120 lb my ass!!! I'm about 120 and im alot thinner, so it doesnt make sense. but whatever, she has a great body and beautiful eyes, though I really dont believe she's 120
Reply to this Comment
oh wait, if she's 5'2, then she could be 120.
Reply to this Comment
I'm glad I kept reading, cuz I was gonna ask how tall you are. But, since I'm hear, anyway... Lana, how tall are you?
Reply to this Comment
I honestly think she is fat. She looks alright in these pictures because she is wearing figure flattering clothes but she looks big when she wears those sausage dresses (which she seems to love) and swimsuits. She is too flabby and wide for my taste. She's not even that overweight, she is just out of shape which makes her look even larger than she is. You can clearly see she doesn't exercise as she is very flabby and there is a lack of muscle tone. She needs to lose 10-15 lbs and shape up her body.
Reply to this Comment
i just dont understand how people can say shes ugly or fat! if i could look like anyone for a day it would undoubtedly be kim, she just get better looking everytime i see a pic of her. And i think she looks amazing without all her make up on. Her hair is hot, her lips her eyes her boobs her bum her EVERYTHING is gorgeous. I love you kim!!! in fact im updating my hottest women list! id take her body over a supermodels, shes on the right side of curvy (not that there is a wrong side imo).
Reply to this Comment
Hahah, slut toe-rings on both feet...
Reply to this Comment
Kim has a very pretty face, hair and skin colour.
I really like her type of beauty, but in my opinion she needs to take off around 15 lbs at least.
She is definitely an overwheight person in my opinion.
Reply to this Comment
Lmao at the sausage dress comment.
She doesn't look that fat here. She has such a lazy body.
Some of you lot need to realise that not every supermodel has the same type of body, skinny, no arse, boobs or hips. Most do but not all.
I don't like Kim's body at all. She's too wide, no muscle tone and everything is too big.
I Prefer bodies like Bar Rafaeli and Catrinel Menghia
Reply to this Comment
Bar Rafaeli has an amazing body.
Reply to this Comment
Just think how ugly her hairy snatch must look !!
Reply to this Comment
Before saying anything else I'm just going to say that I HATE this "reply" feature! Because of it I only now read messages posted 3 or 4 days ago.
Now, onto business:
"52. Goliano
I take it you're referring to "nick (Uncertified Bastard)". When someone comes behind you and replies, ahead of your comment, it throws the numbering off.
And whether or not she is "one of those bitches", I hate 'em, too. There's nothin' that pisses me off more than takin' a babe out for a meal, only to sit there and watch her pick thru her food like there's a land mine in it or somethin'. If you're not fuckin' hungry, just order an appetizer or go to the salad bar, Dammit!! Food ain't cheap!
Disclaimer: There's plenty that pisses me off more than that, but I'm just sayin'.
53. Goliano
I take that back... I see it wasn't "nick (Uncertified Bastard)" you were referring to... we still cool though, Andromeda18_, aren't we? Just don't waste my money at the crab shack. ;)"
Don't worry, I wouldn't waste your money. I mean, maybe by American standards I would (Americans are well known for their jumbo-sized portions) but I can assure you that when I eat out I usually eat until my stomach is almost bursting. Of course, I have to like the food in order for that to happen.
"66. Anonymous Black Chick - ABC
And because countless studies have pointed to men's preference for a certain hip-to-waist ratio which, once again, you say you prefer to look like straight up and down like a man's body. You're right, you have a personal preference and that's cool but you're not most men, you are a closet homosexual.
67. AlinaMaria
hips do denote femininity, i dont think anyone can argue with that. Like you say, you can be thin and have hips. I find straight up and down bodies on women to be really unattractive. I think hips are more important than breasts when it comes to having a womanly silouette (or however its spelled) because even women who have big breasts but no hips manage to look boyish to me."
That's definitely true, women can be thin and have hips. As I said before I'm thin, but because I have a 24'' waist and 34'' hips my waist-to-hip ratio is 0,705, pretty close to the "preferred" waist-to-hip ratio ABC was talking about which is 0,70. Of course, and this goes to show how we're never pleased with what we have, when I was younger I wished I was curvier and now I wish I wasn't so curvy. And then there's Rachel Bilson, skinny, tiny but extremely curvy.
"68. hi (Uncertified Bastard)
That's the funniest thing I've read all day. So, by your reasoning, every heterosexual man that likes say, an asian woman, is actually gay because they don't have child birthing hips? Seriously, do you do comedy as a career? If not, you should. You're hilarious.
69. Anonymous Black Chick - ABC
So you are implying that all Asian women are curve-free and have the bodies of young boys? Nice. I'm sure they'd love that kind of flattery from a guy like you (lol)
70. hi (Uncertified Bastard)
Comparitively speaking. If you compare Ziyi Zhang to Kim K, there is a huge difference."
Actually, while I have to agree most Asian women have pretty flat butts (not Thai women though) many of them are rather curvy. Not only is that quite noticible if you visit Japan in the summer (skimpier outfits), there are official numbers to prove that:
"The Shape of Japanese Women in their 20s is Ideal!
Many scholars have studied the ideal body shape for women. Among them is the survey carried out by Professor. Devendra SINGH, for the University of Texas. He explored men's thoughts on the ideal women's body. He researched which female body shapes men were most attracted to by showing illustrations of women with various waist-to-hip ratios, and three different weights (thin, average and heavy) to men in 16 different world cultures.
It was not the slim women, but the women who had 0.7 waist-to-hip ratio (waist size divided by hip size) that men were most attracted to. In short, men felt that the more beautiful bodies had a thin waist and large hips. They preferred a distinct difference between waist size and hip size. Most of the models in men's magazines and car race models have these proportions.
What about Japanese women's figures? According to a survey result released in April, 2004 by Wacol, a leading underwear manufacture, the average Japanese woman in her 20's has a bust measuring 81.3 cm (32''), waist measuring 64.7 cm (25.47'') and hip measuring 87.6 cm (34.49''). Their average height is 158 cm (62.20'') )and weight is 49.7 kg (110.44lbs). As Japanese women are generally short with small busts, their bodies are easily mistaken as "bad shapes," but in fact the waist-to-hip ratio for a Japanese women in her 20s' is 0.738, a result so close to the ideal that it shows a well-proportioned bodyline."
"74. Anonymous Black Chick - ABC
I was pointing out that straight men are drawn to a certain hip-to-waist ratio and gay men have a stated preference for more straight, masculine bodies, which you have yet to provide even any anecdotal evidence to the contrary. This does not disclude women who may be more petite or thin. If what you actually meant is that you don't like curvy asses, then that is what you should have said.
77. Anonymous Black Chick - ABC
You said you prefer women to not have them. The vast majority of straight men do not. Hence my assumption that you are gay. But y'know what? Something like 3% of straight men say they also like hipless women, so perhaps u are among them."
You know, even if it's only 3% there are men who prefer non-curvy women. There's nothing wrong with that and it doesn't mean they're gay, it's just a matter of preference. There are also men who like morbidly obese women, that doesn't make them any less heterosexual. And what about me? I prefer Asian men, with their thin bodies and delicate features and because of that you'd probably say I'm a lesbian. Yet, as far as women go I find the thin moderately-curvy type more attractive. Do I prefer men then? Plus, my boyfriend of 8 years perfectly fits the definition of "hunk". What does all of this make me? Lesbian? Hetero? Bi? If it means anything I can tell you that I feel absolutely no sexual attraction for women.
Reply to this Comment
I apologize for the lack of blank lines in my previous post but it's not my fault, they were there before I hit the "Post comment" button.
Reply to this Comment
120 pounds, yea right. She is a fatty plain and simple. 175 - 190 would be more like it.
Useless fat skank is what she really is.
Reply to this Comment
That ass is soooooo fat, she proabibly has to shit in the tub cause she cant use a regular toilet.
She makes cow poop look like rabbit turds when compared to the crap that comes out of that fat, dirty hole.
Reply to this Comment
Make a Scandalous Comment