she NEVER did anything for me

other that being FREAKY - what's she got

Hey, Angie....don't you have some kids to go take care of?

I'm so ready for her to disappear from existance.

Angelina Jolie is the most beautiful woman inside and outside... Cheers to Glory.

Woah! Homegirl needs more make-up for closeups like that.

In deep concentration? well, age work and motherhood is creeping up on her....she sure losing her appeal...I think.

she is most beautiful

She looks old and manly.

I HATE THIS HORSEFISH

she is a manipulative hobab with the most manipulative DISGUSTING personality ever. This whole charity shit is to get back at daddy. Voight was very concerned with minorities and human services, but it wasn't an extremely publicized thing. She had 'problems' with him and this is her way to get back for being recognized... kind of "na na na na na I'm better than you"

Karma's a bitch- Shiloh looks like her grandpa

the most beautiful woman ever! haters need not reply

1st picture:

"who farted? that must have been one of my worldly adopted babies"

The first picture is awesome. It is her impression of Renee Zellweger!

BEAUTIFUL!!!

Bitchs looks fucking disgusting.

I thought she would have had all of the world's problems figured out by now. Well, at least she is trying.

Beautiful face, and since she's a sincerely good person, I'll overlook the fact that she has absolutely no ass. Would definitely have to bang her missionary.

gorgeous and smart!

She's not aging well at all and she looks really manly. She has very nice eyes, hair, arms and chest but the rest of her is extremely overrated esp those fish lips. She looks about 43. Michelle Pfeiffer in her 30's and early 40's looked a whole lot better than Angelina but then again Michelle looks a lot better than most women.

She should go to Canada and try to convince the people to ban seal hunting!

Over 300,000 innocent baby harp seals are bludgeoned to death every year for selfish purposes! People kill them in inhumane ways to take their fur and sell them to stupid rich people.

she looks good for a mom of 4.or5.she never had a good body.just boobs.but i admire that isn't going out to every nite.whoring herself on every redcarpet.flashing her coochie.getting dui's and being carted off to rehab.she is really trying to help out children and poor peeps who can't help themselves.i can't hate her.

She'll always look better than the she-he Maniston. But she is going down hill.

the woman looks not a day under 40. and dont tell me its cuz she has 5 kids. cuz we all know she also has 5 nannies.

Not aging well.

Chick is SO overrated.

bitch, homewrecker

stop hiding behind the pretense of trying to look profound and holier than the rest of us. you're an actress, for petessake, you can FAKE an intelligent look.
so overrated. sheesh.

:( she's aging

Not so great looking up close. She seems very pretentious and holier-than-thou.

wow, that 1st picture....she must have finally looked into a mirror....

overrated chick, don't know her that well, but shes looks smart...

evenually having theses US Soldier from Oregon and Incorporated to NAVY, probably all the soldiers that comes back to home, probably takes up to 15-18 months also 76 months to come back from IRAQ after year stay intermission

angie used to be a stunning actress...... before bradstinkypitt fucked her!!!!

Angelina Jolie is insane! How on earth can
she go around to the U.N., Syria, Jordan,
Iraqi officials and General Petraeus,
suggesting that they all help in resettling
millions of Iraqi refugees by helping in
rebuilding their damaged homes or
building new homes. How can this well meaning
liberal run around trying to return millions of
refugees to a country in the middle of a bloody
country's war. Liberals, secular progressives,
the liberal mainstream media(msm), and
democratic politicians have, on a daily basis,
pronounced General Petraeus' surge as dead.
Granted newspapers have RARELY reported on the
war for at least the last six months, which
would lead a cynic to believe that the bloody
civil war, along with the daily loss of
hundreds of lives is being hushed up by the
MSM. Furthermore, suicide bombings which
resulted in suicide bombers killing hundreds
of Baghdad citizens on a daily basis prior to
the surge are no longer being reported on the
front page of the MSM, especially the new york
times. It makes no sense, how could General
Petraeus bring an end to a horrible, bloody war
in which just a year ago massive suicide bombings
were killing hundreds of Iraqis on a daily basis.
Particularly in light of Hillary Clinton's
summarizing of General Petraeus' testimony
as lies:"I think the reports that you provide
to us really require the willing suspension
of disbelief." And the Marxist Moveon.Org's
description of General Petraeus' despicable
character: "General Petraeus or General betray
us." If you can't trust Bill and Hillary to tell
the truth, who can you trust, General Petraeus?
If there is one thing the public has learned about
politicians is that Billhillary don't lie -
especially when exposing a four star general who
lied under oath when he stated that the surge was
a success. Why Hillary hasn't brought perjury
charges against General Petraeus for lying
in testimony before congress and the nation
about the surge that has apparently failed is
beyond me. Prior to the surge their were
massive daily explosions throughout baghdad and
now there are no reports! Why aren't you
reporting the daily massive loss in lives. The
bodies are piling up and no newspapers are
reporting it. Dam* it, report all the massive
bombings or anything, no matter how small!!!!!
Continued

2of6
Therefore, since liberals, progressives,
and democrats proclaim that the surge has
failed, it's incumbent upon them to urge the
MSM, the LA Times, Washington Post, and
the New York Times to resume reporting on the
"Civil War" and the bloody slaughter taking
place on a daily basis in Iraq. Furthermore,
the New York Times has betrayed liberals,
progressives, democrats, and democratic
politicians by publishing an extremely
damaging article by two of it's veteran war
correspondents titled "A War We Just Might
Win". Furthermore, they hired William Kristol,
editor of the Weekly Standard, as a
correspondent. Bill is a war hawk that
predicted the surge would be a success and
that President Bush would succeed in an
article titled "Why President Bush will be a
Winner."

John burns joined a group of historians and
reporters on the Charlie Rose show discussing
the Iraq war the 5th of March. Burns was
awarded two Pulitzer prizes for his courageous
wartime reporting. Burns spent five years
covering Iraq as the New York Times Baghdad
bureau chief and said that Al-anbar province
(comprising 1/3 of Iraq), once written off in
the national intelligence estimate as having
been taken over by Al-Qaeda is now peaceful
and cleared of Al-Qaeda by marines and
Sunni tribes, led by over 300 sheiks, who
turned their guns on Al-Qaeda in a national
movement led by over 300 sheiks called
"The Awakening."

The march 10, 2008 issue of U.S. News & World
report includes a report from Baghdad by
war reporter Alex Kingsbury that reports
violence has dramatically dropped during the
surge. He reports that in Baghdad's Rasheed
area, for example, murders FELL from 553 in
January 2008 TO 20 in January 2008; attacks
using IED explosives dropped FROM 178 in
February 2007 TO 5 last month.

Al-Qaeda escaped to Diyala province only to
have Diyala's tribes joined U.S. Forces in
their fight against Al-Qaeda. Al-qaeda has
largely been cleared out of Diyala province.
The Awakening movement has now spread to the
Shiites in southern Iraq with the Shiites
joining the U.S. Forces and the Sunnis in
fighting Al-Qaeda. Burns said that Al-Sadr
agreed to another six months ceasefire due
to heavy losses inflicted on his Mahdi army
by coilition forces comprised of Iraqi,
Kurd, and U.S. Forces. The Mahdi
army is largely scattered and coalition
forces are now concentrated on Shiite
splinter groups trained by Iran in the use
of explosively formed improvised bombs
manufactured in Iran.

These are dishonest articles and reports by
the New York Times reporters that should never
have seen the light of day. By not reporting
on the bloody civil war and massive loss of
life taking place on a daily basis, the
liberal mainstream media has led Jolie to
believe that General Petraeus is succeeding
in implementing President Bush's order to
execute the surge and end the civil war and
stabilize Iraq. Being aware of the
compassionate nature of liberals, secular
progressives, democrats, and their
deep love and compassion for the suffering of
Iraqis, i can only imagine their exasperation
with Jolie's naivete.

Continued

3of6
Another source of misinformation is CNN's
Michael Ware who entered Iraq from Kurdistan
before the the U.S. Invasion started and
continues reporting from Iraq for CNN. Mr.
Ware's reputation for meeting and traveling
with insurgents, Iraqis, and as the only
reporter to meet with al-qaeda, and LIVE, has
a certain cachet that other reporters don't
have in CNN's opinion. Mr. Ware had a
reputation for honesty but over the last year
he has made a 180 degree turn in his reporting,
claiming that the surge has been successful in
an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper as follows:
==========
February 16, 2008

Anderson Cooper:

Michael, in terms of long term, i mean, how
do you measure the progress, militarily and
politically?
----------
Michael ware, CNN correspondent: Well, Anderson,
clearly, there has been progress in this war. I
mean, the number of deaths of both American
troops and civilians are clearly down. In
Baghdad alone, comparing this month to the same
month last year, *1,000* people died from
terrorist attacks last year, less than *200* this
year, ~800~ from sectarian killings last year,
only about ~40~ this year.
----------
While the surge has been successful, it's far
too fragile to withdraw troops.
----------
And there's long-term consequences for withdrawal
that none of the candidates are talking about.
There will be costs in the future. Again, the
American people need to hear this, Anderson.
----------
So, what's happening on the ground is indeed a
success in many ways. But you're not getting
the full picture on the campaign trail, and
perhaps that shouldn't surprise anyone --
Anderson.
----------
Anderson Cooper: When you talk to soldiers --
and that's sort of the perspective on most of
the military leaders you talk to probably on a
daily basis -- what are they saying about troop
levels down the road? I mean, in order to
sustain the military side of this, in order to
sustain the military successes that universally
just everyone has said we have seen, what kind
of troop levels do you need down the road?
----------
I read some report by Anthony Cordesman
recently, and i think they were talking about
100,000 troops well into 2016, i think.
----------
Ware: Well, that's certainly a number that
members of the Iraqi government are bandying
about, 100,000 U.S. Troops, down from what we
will soon have of just over 130,000.
----------
But i can tell you now, Anderson, Senator
McCain mentioned 100 years American troops
will be here. But i can tell you that
American commanders here on the ground know
that they're going to be here a lot longer
than many people would otherwise expect.
----------
Certainly, this sense of, once people get into
office they will start pulling the troops home,
is not a view shared by many here on the ground.
And many believe that what's being said on the
campaign will not necessarily be the action
that a new president will take, no matter what
party they're from. There's realities here. You
just can't pull out -- Anderson.
Continued
--------------------

4of6
This is bull!! I know this is bull because
Bill "potato nose" Mohr and Keith Olbermann, both
secular progressives, have had streams of secular
progressives on their shows who all say that
the surge - and General Petraeus - is a dismal
failure.
----------
Beware of steps being taken by at least four
U.S. Oil companies to expedite oil
production and exploration in Iraq. A number
of experts have predicted that the
world's production of oil will peak between
2015 and 2020. Once world oil production peaks
and then begins to decrease, the effects of
even a small drop in production can be
devastating - as we're experiencing now.
For instance, during the 1970s oil shocks,
shortfalls in production as small as
5% caused the price of oil to nearly quadruple.
The same thing happened in California a few
years ago with natural gas: A production drop
of less than 5% caused prices to SKYROCKET by
400%.
----------
The below report states that Iraq may have
the world's second largest oil reserves:
==========
Wednesday, july 18, 2007
----------
Baghdad — Iraqi oil production could double in
five years, according to a new study.
----------
The report found that Iraq's oil reserves may
be almost twice as much as previously
estimated. The study by the u.S. Consultancy
IHS said another 100 billion barrels of oil
reserves could be found in Iraq.
----------
IHS said the estimate would rank Iraq as
having the second largest reserves in the
world, following Saudi Arabia. Currently, Iran
has the second largest oil reserves in the
world.
----------
So far, Iraq has reported reserves of 116
billion barrels of oil, middle east newsline
reported.
----------
The consultancy said Iraqi oil production could
also increase from two million to four million
barrels per day.
----------
The new estimate was based on exploration in
Iraq's western desert near the border with
Jordan. So far, Iraq has reported one
commercial discovery in the region.
----------
The below notice confirms that the Iraq
government and U.S. Oil companies are
expediting oil exploration and reconstruction
of oil wells and refineries under the
disillusion that the surge has worked. How
can U.S. Oil companies, such as Exxon-mobile
corporation that earned 60 billion dollars in
profits last year, send their employees into
the middle of that meat grinder. How can oil
companies worth trillions of dollars, and that
build oil wells, refineries, pipelines around
the world not know that the surge is a failure
while DECENT, COMPASSIONATE, HONEST and LOVING
secular progressives such as potato nose and
Keith Olbermann warn that the Surge is a
"failure." Even more disturbing is that when
people learn that companies such as Exxon-
mobile's employees are working throughout Iraq,
they will come to the wrong conclusion that
the Surge is working. The following is a
report that confirms that the contracts for
oil construction/reconstruction is proceeding
post-haste:
==========
Thursday, march 13, 2008
Iraq PM advisor: Majors will accept service
contracts by Monica Mark Dow Jones news
wires.
----------
International oil majors would be willing to
settle for service contracts in known oil
fields in Iraq, the chairman of the advisory
committee to Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-
Maliki said thursday.
==========
Continued

5of6
Speaking in an interview with Arab oil and
gas magazine, thamir Abbas Qhadhban, who is a
former oil minister, said he was certain
international oil companies would accept
service contracts... For already discovered oil
fields "in view of their geological
characteristics, their very great potential,
their low production costs and the current and
future level of oil prices."
----------
While production-sharing contracts, or PCSC,
wouldn't be considered an option by anyone "of
sane mind," for these oil fields, the
government would have to decide if they were
appropriate in areas under explorations --
including the western desert region, Qhadhban
said.
----------
The exploration risks for companies involved in
areas such as the western desert are compounded
by the fact that that even basic infrastructure
is practically nonexistent.
----------
Royal Dutch shell PLC, BP, Exxon-mobil corp.
And Chevron Corp are among the majors expected
to sign technical support agreements with Iraq
over the coming few weeks.
----------
The Iraqi oil ministry has said more than 70
companies are lined up to sign service
contracts over the next 18 months.
----------
The contracts, which allow the companies to
develop a country's oil industry in exchange
for oil or a much smaller percentage of
revenue than when production is shared, are
seen as a stop gap until a national oil law
governing the distribution of Iraq's oil
resources is agreed between Baghdad and the
Kurdistan regional government.
==========
U.S. National guard military petroleum
engineers have been helping Iraqis rebuild
their wells and refineries as we speak. The
following link is to a team of U.S. Military
petrolium engineers and Iraqis working on the
reconstruction of an Iraqi refinery in Al-
Anbar province which a year ago was described
as lost to Al-Qaeda.
----------
Http://Royaldutchshellplc.Com/2008/03/10/
los-angeles-times-fixing-iraq- and-a-refinery/
==========

Hopefully, it is has become perfectly clear that
republicans are disingenuous and that democrats
and secular progressives are truth tellers solely
motivated by their love and compassion for the
iraqi people.
-------------------
The long term plan of the iraq and u.S. Govern-
ments are apparent. The u.S. Has agreed to stay
in iraq until it is stabilized and iraq in turn
has provided u.S. Firms hundreds of oil and gas
service contracts. By staying in iraq, the u.S.
Goals are six-fold: 1) Continue to stabilize iraq
until it can be handed over to the iraqi military
and police 2) rebuild iraq's oil industry, 3)
secure a stable prosperous, free market democracy
in the middle east, 4) add 215 billion to 300
billion barrels of oil to the world market
lowering the price to $50-$55 per barrel of oil,
6) replace thousands of iraq's weapons systems by
ramping up u.S. Military's industrial
complex(iraq recently announced its decision to
purchase 40 commercial aircraft from the u.S at
an estimated cost of $5 billion). The u.S.
Military complex will not need much ramping up to
meet iraq's defensive requirements since more
than 95% of of the money spent by the military on
research, development, and production was
required by president bush to be purchased from u.
S. Firms.
-----------------------
The msm, secular progressives, and democrats have
got to report on the civil war and bloody slaughter
that is taking place daily in iraq before millions
of refugees flood back into that awful meat grinder.
Come on new york times, save those refugees and report
on all the slaughter going on or they might believe
that general petraeus - and his staff - are
succeeding and that there has been a drastic
decrease in violence and that al-qaeda is taking
a bloody beating. Hurry, new york times!! We all
count on you for the truth!!! So if you're done
with exposing that traitorous self-serving vile
mccain, please resume reporting the horrific
carnage taking place on a daily basis in iraq or
the public will begin suspecting that you and
secular progressives are liars!!! With angelina
joie pushing hard to bring millions of refugees
back into that bloody meat grinder, you will be
responsible for the mass slaughter that is
certain to take place - please, for god's sake,
hurry!!!

P.S. With iraq contracting to have its oil wells
serviced for 30 billion, they will be producing 2.5
Billion barrels per day within 7 seven years. At $110
per barrel, iraq's oil-derived income will be greater
than $100 billion per year. Oil service &
exploration contracts are anticipated to be
signed within weeks. Worldwide only 35 companies
have qualified to participate in iraq's coming
licensing round for oil and gas contracts, the
iraqi oil ministry said on tuesday. The seven
qualifying u.S. Firms are exxon- mobile, chevron,
conocophillips, marathon oil, sunoco, hess,
western refinding. ------------------ In addition
to rebuilding iraq's oil industry infrastructure
and exploring for oil in high risk oil sharing
contracts, the u.S. Will continue replacing
iraq's depleted defensive weapons systems with
the world's most advanced weapons systems at a
competive bargain price in light of the weak U.S.
Dollar.

Hi all!

G'night

polonesesso

She's sexy, but she's not very attractive to me. Does that make any sense?

hello poperato!!! hello poperato!!! hello poperato!!!